Pintard: By-election result not referendum on FNM leadership

By KEILE CAMPBELL

Tribune Staff Reporter

kcampbell@tribunemedia.net

FREE National Movement leader Michael Pintard said yesterday he will be “good regardless” of the outcome of the November 24 Golden Isles by-election, rejecting claims that the race could be a referendum on his leadership.

He dismissed speculation that his political future hinges on the result, accusing Progressive Liberal Party insiders of trying to shape that narrative. He said his focus is on residents' needs rather than partisan gamesmanship.

“I’m here representing the Bahamian people, I’m not representing myself,” he said. “I’m going to be good regardless of what happens this election, by-election, or general election. I’m good, it’s not about me.”

Mr Pintard said his party’s attention is on issues affecting Golden Isles, especially in Adelaide, where residents have long struggled with transportation. He announced that FNM candidate Brian Brown will launch a shuttle service between Adelaide and Bacardi Road before Monday to help residents commute.

“The by-election is not about Brian Brown, Michael Pintard or the FNM and our prospects for the future,” he said. “It is about the prospects for the future, for the residents of Golden Isles. Will they get the representation that they need in order to address the issues that are important to them?”

Mr Pintard said the FNM’s campaign aims to highlight the lack of consistent delivery from the Davis administration.

He dismissed the idea that history is against his party, noting that while no governing party has ever lost a by-election, the FNM would “fight this government no matter.”

“Our role is to provide the best possible leadership option for residents and put that person before them,” he said.

Asked what makes Mr Brown a stronger candidate than his opponent, former Senator Darron Pickstock, Mr Pintard pointed to his record of grassroots service. He said Mr Brown has lived among Golden Isles residents for years and helped families in need, from providing support after storms to assisting those who lost jobs.

He cited examples of residents Mr Brown has helped with repairs, employment, and funeral expenses, saying such hands-on involvement shows the kind of representative he has been long before running for office.

Mr Pintard contrasted this with what he called the PLP’s silence and inaction. He questioned why Mr Pickstock, despite having a national platform in the Senate, had not spoken up on issues affecting Golden Isles or any other community.

“Why should they trust you?” he asked. “You have said that your government has failed, did not return calls, did not deliver on the infrastructural developments, have not addressed the issues that they’re facing in their community — simple things, whether it’s lights, whether it’s roads, a variety of things.”

Comments

TalRussell says...

Yes, I Concur Special Election (SE) result not referendum on RedShirt's leadership....that started long before (SE) got called. **Not winning (SE)** will ignite the spark that wants to move on without a Michael Pintard.'.

Posted 12 November 2025, 3:10 p.m. Suggest removal

IslandWarrior says...

…yes, just another example of a wandering soul, the poet who fancied himself a leader, the writer who imagined he could command a crowd, yet never mastered the weight of his own shadow. He dreamed of thrones but tripped over truths, rehearsed greatness but could never live it. A legend in his diary… and nowhere else.

Posted 12 November 2025, 6:42 p.m. Suggest removal

TalRussell says...

@IslandW, Too much explaining can sometimes be an indicator of "nervous" insecurity, particularly if the timing may negatively affects how constituents' yet to vote in a Special Election.

Posted 12 November 2025, 7:31 p.m. Suggest removal

LastManStanding says...

Why move on right before a general election? Ingraham had his chances, Minnis had his chances, and it's only fair Pintard has his chance. He gets blown out fine move on and replace him as leader but it makes zero sense for the FNM to make any big changes in leadership at the moment. Besides its not like the FNM is filled to the brim with viable replacements anyways.

Posted 12 November 2025, 10:22 p.m. Suggest removal

LastManStanding says...

> no governing party has ever lost a by-election

This is inaccurate, the FNM lost the 2010 Elizabeth by-election albeit it was by a razor thin contested margin with a PLP incumbent.

Posted 12 November 2025, 10:14 p.m. Suggest removal

LastManStanding says...

Honestly I think people trying to box this by-election into the historical pattern are failing to account for the fact that Bahamian elections are fundamentally different now.

1.) Coalition is sticking around and it's up in the air who they are going to pull more votes from. The 3rd party dynamic is going to be a lasting (and growing) factor going forward in Bahamian elections as long as the two main parties continue to promote lacklustre candidates and leadership.

2.) Last general election had the lowest turnout ever and I doubt it will improve much if at all in the next one. Voter apathy is very high and no telling which of the main parties is more politically apathetic at this point.

Besides the seat is a swing seat and the incumbent representation was lacklustre. I would not be surprised if the FNM wins at and neither would I be surprised if the PLP wins it. Tbh I wouldn't really be surprised if Coalition wins it either. Things are just different now and the old 2 party high turnout calculus isn't going to apply going forward. Honestly there are some parallels with the 2010 Elizabeth by-election and we all saw how that one turned out. Wouldn't be surprised at a repeat of that.

Posted 12 November 2025, 10:43 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment