Davis government defends $20m annual price tag for pay rises as unions cry foul

By LEANDRA ROLLE

Tribune Chief Reporter

lrolle@tribunemedia.net

THE Davis administration will spend $20million a year to sustain its recent civil service salary increases, a cost officials defended yesterday as unions intensified criticism that the adjustments were too small.

OPM Director of Communications Latrae Rahming said the government’s salary update was a “complex” exercise, adding that questions about the size and timing of the increases could not be answered in isolation. He also revealed that over 17,000 civil servants received their salary adjustments on Wednesday. His comments came as some union leaders derided the adjustments as “crumbs” and others claimed certain workers received nothing.

Mr Rahming said the increases varied across categories but rejected suggestions that lower-level staff benefited the least. He said those employees saw the biggest percentage gains because fixed increments were applied.

“For example, a employee in the M6 scale who was making minimum wage in January 2022 would have experienced an increase in salary of 27.5 percent since through wage adjustments, excluding increments,” he said. “For a trained teacher, the increase would be 19.8 percent. In addition, this latest increase of $1,400 would be equivalent to the largest annual increase given to any trained teacher in the BUT’s latest industrial agreement.”

For a deputy permanent secretary, he said the increase would be 15.8 percent.

Mr Rahming said this is the first government-initiated salary review exercise in more than two decades, aside from union-negotiated increases. He added that the annual cost of the recent adjustments is about $20m, and that more than $60m in salary adjustments have been provided to public officers over the past four years.

He said civil servants have received yearly salary increases under the Davis administration — consistency he said had not been seen in more than a decade. He cited upgraded pay, allowances, insurance, and retention bonuses for teachers and nurses; improved entry-level rates, allowances, and overtime systems for law enforcement; and higher scales and increased allowances for line and administrative staff.

“This review focused on correcting the pay system for government employees whose scales had fallen behind for many years,” he said. “ All of this prepared the way for the National Salary Review — the first full modernisation of public service pay in fourteen years.”

He added: “With the final group updated yesterday, every officer in the public service is now in the new structure. Every officer has received an increase. Every officer has received the retroactive amount owed.”

In a statement yesterday, Free National Movement leader Michael Pintard called the payments a “slap in the face” and urged civil servants not to accept “crumbs.” He accused the government of misplacing its priorities by spending on lavish trips and overpriced consultants while failing to properly compensate workers.

He said a Pintard administration would be inclusive, transparent, and open to communication, with a focus on fair contracts, improved training, clear promotion pathways, and better pay. “We will not make promises that we can’t keep to you,” he said.


Comments

moncurcool says...

> Mr Rahming said the increases varied
> across categories but rejected
> suggestions that lower-level staff
> benefited the least. He said those
> employees saw the biggest percentage
> gains because fixed increments were
> applied.
>
> “For example, a employee in the M6 scale who was making minimum wage in
> January 2022 would have experienced an
> increase in salary of 27.5 percent
> since through wage adjustments,
> excluding increments,” he said. “For a
> trained teacher, the increase would be
> 19.8 percent. In addition, this latest increase of $1,400 would be equivalent
> to the largest annual increase given
> to any trained teacher in the BUT’s
> latest industrial agreement.”
>
> For a deputy permanent secretary, he said the increase would be 15.8
> percent.

Bit these dudes really spin doctors and believe Bahamians stupid. Does he not realize that 27 percent for a person on minimum wage is peanuts compared to 15% for a deputy permanent salary. He tries to use percentages rather than the actual amount to make people think the people at the lower end got more.

Assume minimum wage is roughly 1200 per month and deputy permanent secretary is 5000 (and they are more than that). That would equate to $300 roughly for minimum wage and $750 for permanent secretary.

Time for these dudes to go in 2026.

Posted 28 November 2025, 9:45 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

Also $20 million a year by 17,000 people is $1,176.47 each or $22.63 per week. Now as some have got more then that, there will be a large number on less then that a week. Whilst every increase is good news, lets not make it seem that this is a game changer for people.

Posted 28 November 2025, 11:27 a.m. Suggest removal

Sickened says...

Pintard said it's crumbs and shouldn't be accepted? Before he says more he should remember that his government is going to be the ones finding ways to pay for increase in the coming years. He's going to have to figure out where this money is coming from after the next election. Is he cutting expenses somewhere else or increasing taxes or praying that the economy continues to grow?

Posted 28 November 2025, 2:35 p.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

They should be grateful it is a gift. One can not tell the gift giver how much the gift should be. Superwoman dressed in her pajamas pants should take her leader Pintard advice and not accept. The money will stay in the treasury for better use.

Posted 28 November 2025, 3:24 p.m. Suggest removal

rosiepi says...

A gift? Long overdue salary increases that do not even come close to the rate of inflation for hard working Bahamians is a gift?

Such comments are deeply insulting. And one can guarantee from the ego displayed by this squawker that upon receiving salary increases himself he’d have been highly affronted to have his due called “a gift”!

Posted 29 November 2025, 4:05 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment