Hospital approval a ‘foregone conclusion’

By ANNELIA NIXON

Tribune Business Reporter

anixon@tribunemedia.net

Nearby residents yesterday described as "a foregone conclusion" the swift preliminary approval granted to New Providence's new hospital by the Town Planning Committee.

Despite homeowners in nearby communities voicing fears that flooding, noise pollution, increased traffic and a higher risk of crime made the Perpall Tract site inappropriate for the $285.25m hospital, the planning regulator yesterday announced it has granted the preliminary go-ahead within just three days of the public consultation and hearing.

“We were pretty certain they were going to be in favour of it,” Barbara Hepburn, president of the Grove West Homeowners Association, said. “We just didn't know to what extent. So at least they have conditional approval, which is still better than outright approval. And hopefully our concerns could be heard and attended to in order for them to move to the final stages.

“We pretty much knew it was going to be somewhat approved, because we were told before it was approved in principle, and they had the certificate from the Department of Environmental Planning and Protection. So it's a government project, a government department. It's highly unlikely that they will rule against what the Government and the Cabinet decided.

"So we pretty much knew the direction in which it was going. But we were happy at least we were able to voice our complaints or our issues with the Department of Physical Planning. In that way, they can at least take into account what we said and what our concerns are.”

Cecil Ferguson, president of the Silver Cay Club homeowners association, during the Town Planning Committee hearing noted that during three other meetings called to discuss the new hospital, Dr Michael Darville, minister of health and wellness, “spoke as if it was a foregone conclusion” and requested statistical information on the amount of objections be provided.

“I asked him that for a reason,” Mr Ferguson said. “Because at each of the meetings, they collected information from those of us who participated in those sessions. They wanted to know our personal details, as well as why we were objecting to the proposal and so on and so forth. And so they have, I'm sure, statistics on just how much opposition they got to the project.

“So now that they've decided to move forward, which is absolutely no surprise to me, it's like, what do we do? It's annoying. It's disappointing, because we put these people in place to serve us, not to impose their will on us.

"And that's the point that I was making also in the meeting, because my main point to him was you just seem like you're pushing forward. You're not listening to the people. Even in his responses, the minister, that is, he was very dismissive in terms of answering questions. He never answered directly.”

The approval granted to New Providence's new hospital was made on that the Government provides “drainage control measures on the site subject to the approval of the civil design section of the Ministry of Works & Family Island Affairs”.

It must also provide “detailed access and circulation design drawings for review and approval by the Ministry of Works and Family Island Affairs”. Both Ms Hepburn and Mr Ferguson believe those conditions will not ease any of their concerns, the latter adding that he has “zero confidence” these conditions will be met.

“Well, he [Dr Darville] was dismissive of all the other points, and opposition and concerns that were raised by all of those residents in the neighbouring communities,” Mr Ferguson said. “The Government will be equally dismissive. So I have zero confidence that they will meet any of those conditions. And just how every person who was in that room on Tuesday spoke against the project, none of that amounted to anything...

“And some of us were representing not just ourselves, but we were representing communities. So I was there as president of the homeowners association of Silver Cay Club, which is a community of 43 residents, as I'd indicated in the meeting.

"And Ms Barbara Hepburn, she was there representing Grove West Homeowners Association. And she was representing at least about 300 of us, because I also have a home in Grove West. I have two properties, like I said, within a quarter mile radius of that hospital, and another property some two or three miles away from there. So three times' over, I'm a concerned citizen and resident,” he added.

“What it what is so disheartening is that, I think to get to the point where the people that we elect don't serve the interest that we put them there to serve, that's very disappointing.” Ms Hepburn said while the conditions stipulated may benefit the hospital site, they do not help surrounding communities.

“They probably will be able to raise the site and do whatever is necessary to build within the well field or in the vicinity, but for the immediate neighbourhoods, once that is done, the water now will have to find some place to go, which will be the neighbourhoods,” Ms Hepburn said.

“And for me, I'm talking about the one west of the highway, which is the Grove West and the Vista Marina. Vista Marina was the one that was heavily flooded, and was underwater with just a tropical storm. So now, if they build up their site according to what is necessary, I'm not seeing how they're going to mitigate against flooding in our area. So I would want to see something how they will deal with that for us.

“For instance, in Vista Marina, will they develop a catch pond on the corner just when you enter Vista Marina from the highway, because the water flows from there to our area. So I'm not seeing anything concerning how they will address flooding in the surrounding area, which will be created once they decide how they will contain or work within the water table where they're putting the hospital. They're talking about them, but they're not talking about us.”

Ms Hepburn added that the conditions imposed do not address traffic concerns, as there is often congestion stemming from the six-legged roundabout. Noise is still an issue, notwithstanding the potential addition of constant sirens. She also called attention to the rise in crime in the area, suggesting that if the hospital is built the Government should invest in the installation of CCTV on the streets.

Comments

realitycheck242 says...

All signs point to this hospital project in the well field being "Stop Review and Canceled by the incoming FNM administration. Remember The Minnis Government had the money in the Bank for the Extension to the New critical care block at the PMH, the PLP cancelled that so what goes around will come around next year.

Posted 10 October 2025, 11:02 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

Thats why PLP will make sure they start construction etc to make it harder

Posted 10 October 2025, 11:40 a.m. Suggest removal

rosiepi says...

Davis & Co were at the UN again lecturing delegates about the plight of smaller nations at the mercy of large vigorous economies & their bad environmental decisions, their vast pollution rates that have hastened the worst of climate change for vulnerable islands of the Caribbean.

And here is just another example of our wind bag’s hypocrisy, making the Bahamas a laughingstock on the world’s stage.
A coming white elephant that will sit so large no flood mitigation will help it’s neighboring environs or itself.
Future generations will be saddled with millions in debt and costs for triple the ordinary maintenance remediation due to flooded, degraded and inadequate infrastructure & systems.
$300M will not cover the build out w/all the bells & whistles promised by the PLP because that’s secondary to the cost of graft, inflated costs and overruns.

Then there’s the surety of all the padded change orders and not just for the bells, but the mundane & deliberate omissions like say for an HVAC system, fully equipped operating theaters or all the site work…
This endeavour is not for benefit of Bahamians, one wonders if the NIB will even provide coverage!

Posted 10 October 2025, 5:12 p.m. Suggest removal

empathy says...

Interesting observation.

Maybe there should be an investigation about this project. Who benefits? etc etc.

As for other hospital projects by our government none more problematic than the delays encountered by the present A&E redevelopment at our PMH. Excuses abound! However it is a great example why Bahamians should have No faith in this $300M project even if we ignore all the great points mentioned in this article and by previous folks, including the very doctors and nurses who will run the facilities…

Posted 11 October 2025, 7:22 p.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

There are reports of no beds at the hospital this has been so all during the Fnm time in power it makes sense for a new hospital
So that sick people will have beds. To lie on. The FNMS are troubled because they did not have the vision

Posted 12 October 2025, 5:12 p.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

Do the residents know of a different site to build the hospital. PMH IS NOT THE PLACE EMOUGH CONGESTION ALLREADY.

Posted 12 October 2025, 5:18 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment