Well, they are in now. So are they going to advertise the amount of murders on their watch like 9 in one week. and 9 shot at once in a night club. Nope. Because "The former government caused this and Ingraham cause that"
This chart is also very interesting because it shows that almost 30,000 people did not want either PLP or FNM to be the government. Give or take the invalid votes and people who had no way of making it to the polls. I also looked at the results from the previous election and noticed that the PLP had roughly the same amount of supports. They got virtually no new supporters %age wise. The FNM lost support %age wise but we cannot tell from the charts if most switched to plp, dna, bcp or just didn't vote. The 13,000 DNA votes is a large number but almost 16,000(out of the total of registered voters) is large as well. Does anyone know if there is a chart that shows the amount of 1st time voters or 1st time registered? And total discarded or incorrect votes.?
maybw guiltyy take insult to notsogullable's comments. Everyone has their opinions. Everyone has made good points. even here n there tal russel has made points (although rare) . We all should read post fully before responding. when yoy got people sayin that ingraham ran for pm in 2002 they clearly dont know enough history to make a statement lije that. Sayin that people who voted for a candidate that lost votes adds up to zero is like saying that the dna n bcp had no supporters.
Yes, we can clearly see that by only glancing at the figures. The point was to show the actual counted votes that went to each particular party. Nobody knows what the 9%(out of the total registered would have done) and the less than 1% were for Independent and BCP. That is why it adds up to 99%.
242 says...
Well, they are in now. So are they going to advertise the amount of murders on their watch like 9 in one week. and 9 shot at once in a night club. Nope. Because "The former government caused this and Ingraham cause that"
On Disgust over PLP posters
Posted 29 May 2012, 6:07 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
Good points made here. Don't forget about the 1997 elections though...
On Time for rebirth of the FNM
Posted 29 May 2012, 6:02 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
Truth. The majority of the people in the Bahamas are not PLP's but the PLP is the government. That's scary
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 29 May 2012, 2:40 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
LOL!
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 29 May 2012, 2:38 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
This chart is also very interesting because it shows that almost 30,000 people did not want either PLP or FNM to be the government. Give or take the invalid votes and people who had no way of making it to the polls. I also looked at the results from the previous election and noticed that the PLP had roughly the same amount of supports. They got virtually no new supporters %age wise. The FNM lost support %age wise but we cannot tell from the charts if most switched to plp, dna, bcp or just didn't vote. The 13,000 DNA votes is a large number but almost 16,000(out of the total of registered voters) is large as well. Does anyone know if there is a chart that shows the amount of 1st time voters or 1st time registered? And total discarded or incorrect votes.?
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 29 May 2012, 2:31 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
R U Serious?
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 29 May 2012, 10 a.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
maybw guiltyy take insult to notsogullable's comments. Everyone has their opinions. Everyone has made good points. even here n there tal russel has made points (although rare) . We all should read post fully before responding. when yoy got people sayin that ingraham ran for pm in 2002 they clearly dont know enough history to make a statement lije that. Sayin that people who voted for a candidate that lost votes adds up to zero is like saying that the dna n bcp had no supporters.
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 28 May 2012, 12:38 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
Obviously you no longer want to be taken seriously. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone.
On Governor General's throne 'stolen'
Posted 26 May 2012, 7:18 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
Ite Got ya
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 26 May 2012, 7:15 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
Yes, we can clearly see that by only glancing at the figures. The point was to show the actual counted votes that went to each particular party. Nobody knows what the 9%(out of the total registered would have done) and the less than 1% were for Independent and BCP. That is why it adds up to 99%.
On Former PM to give farewell address
Posted 26 May 2012, 4:34 p.m. Suggest removal