Logic would have it that he had sufficient fuel on board for the original flight plan...he got the weather update prior to departure and gave himself an extra hour of fuel at the last minute for contingencies. I would have done the same thing. Flipping his flight from VFR to IFR conditions, an extra hour of fuel would give him PLENTY of reserves to fly to his alternate and still have 45 minutes to spare. Bearing in mind, in VFR conditions, you should have at least 30 minutes reserve in the tanks.

We don't know how much fuel he already had on board...he could have had significantly more...all we know is that he added 160 gallons to what he was already carrying. No plane sits around with empty fuel tanks. Quick websearch quotes the 36A as having a fuel burn of 173 GPH.

Just reviewing Google Earth...the distance from the very end of the approach end of RWY 6, to the GB Shipyard is 2.7 miles, which makes sense with the approach...they want you higher while you clear that work area. 1.9 miles puts him on the other side of the causeway, even with the Bahamian Brewery and the other big warehouse. He crashed more like 2.7 miles out...and, the actual distance on that approach is calculated from the VOR beacon which is in the middle of the field, not at the end of the runway, so the actual distance from the VOR to the shipyard is 3.5 nautical miles.

Don't worry Birdie...it will be 15% very very soon...maybe even more as the economy tanks and the government doesn't get the revenue they were hoping for from a VERY bad tax idea.

Definitely...there was never any doubt that weather played a very major 'contributing' part...but no matter how bad the weather, unless there was a MAJOR downdraft, the pilot should be flying that aircraft within the boundaries set by his own personal abilities, and also those boundaries that are set by the flight conditions at the time, in this case the flight was in IFR, he would have been shooting a very specific documented and laid out instrument approach to that runway. The impact was at 115 feet, according to this story and 1.9 miles out from the runway according to the story run in another publication...? That is crazy, and assuming no other mechanical situation or downdraft scenario that trumps my next statement, it makes for very reckless flying. I will be very curious to see the transcripts and possibly hear some of the CVR recordings. According to the published procedure...at 2.7 miles from the airport he shold be no lower than 680 feet...once he hits the 2.7 mile marker he is only permitted to descend to 480 feet until he has a good solid visual of the runway, at which point he can descend further in a controlled fashion for landing. 115 feet...he shouldn't be that low until he is nearly ontop of the threshold.

We are already trimming staff...mostly through attrition, as they quit or are fired for other reasons, we are not replacing them...wage freeze also in place. Things are going to be tough in about a months time. All you people on the edge better take it easy with that Xmas shopping.

This entire government is an abortion...

I think the only pre-requisite at the moment for your VAT # to be approved and generated is your business license needs to be current.

Sad but true...it will take months, even for a some of your most basic accidents or even incidents...the final report could take ages.

Definitely far more pressing issues that need being dealt with...with that being said, I saw a couple of the photos on FB and thought they were way out of line. It's dramatic enough seeing the crash site, I don't need or want to see dead and mangled bodies. There are also photos on 'news bloggers' FB page of the gal that just got stabbed to death by her boyfriend, laying there in a pool of blood. Really? Is that totally necessary?