Comment history

Clamshell says...

Get help.

Clamshell says...

... and that has what exactly to do with Covid vaccinations, which are entirely voluntary? You get weirder and weirder every day. Seriously, get help.

Clamshell says...

“Mr. Rodney refused to tell Tribune Business what specifically his concerns are.”

Hahaha ... the last sentence in the story speaks volumes: The guy won’t even say what his problem is? Do I recall that this has something to do with the parking lot across the street? Mr. Rodney wants the press and public all up in arms, but cannot explain his issue?

I’m not normally one to defend Dionisio D’Aguilar, but ... oh, please. Dude, get a grip.

Clamshell says...

You are correct ... enforcing different standards to/from different locales makes no sense whatsoever. A virus does not know or care whether you’re a Bahamian, an American, a Canadian, etc. This is just one more example of dumb, dumber and dumbest.

Clamshell says...

I read about da Gama 50 years ago and I have been through the Suez Canal. It’s not what The Tribune is for.

On The fragility of the monster

Posted 6 April 2021, 5:58 p.m. Suggest removal

Clamshell says...

I always turn to The Tribune for news about Vasco da Gama and the Suez Canal. Yes, that’s what I do.

On The fragility of the monster

Posted 6 April 2021, 3:08 p.m. Suggest removal

Clamshell says...

This story has been up for 4 days now. Damn, how do ya get a job like The Tribune staff? Where you can check out and pretend that 4 days go by with nuttin’ happenin’ across the nation?

Clamshell says...

Agreed! It is frightening that a senior police offical can have a pastor taken into police custody and/or arrested on the basis of something he said, no matter how insulting or erroneous it might be. That’s some scary Third World shyte right there.

Clamshell says...

Note the use of the words and phrases, “the theory is ...”, and “presumably” and “could be.” In Britain, the Bahamas, the U.S. and other nations whose laws evolved from the British system, libel and slander remain civil issues. There are no federal criminal sanctions — i.e., criminal conviction, jail term, etc. — for cases of libel/slander. In the U.S. there are some states that have criminal libel on the books, but it’s localized, rarely if ever enforced, and generally would involve a violation of a court order, which is not the situation here.

Clamshell says...

Bzzzzt ... wrong. Libel and slander are civil issues, not criminal-law issues. There are no criminal sanctions for libel and slander.