Comment history

DreamerX says...

IATA is just the round about lobby by member carrier size. They will do their norm, of pressuring US regulators to pester and tie up Bahamas Air with issues as a response. IATA's first and foremost duty historically, has been fixing costs to be lower or slower on the uptick for it's major airlines and making all revenues cost the consumer more to avoid "options" to the consumer. A professional, certified, tie and jacket cartel that does some good, but only as long is it it's profitable.

DreamerX says...

This is almost comical. It's starting to pick up a clear tone and it's disappointing.

On PM: Back me and I may cut VAT again

Posted 28 March 2025, 4:42 p.m. Suggest removal

DreamerX says...

Do you two date?

On Pintard blasted for LNG deal criticism

Posted 25 March 2025, 7:26 a.m. Suggest removal

DreamerX says...

Very bad messaging. PLP or not, whether this is the best result is inconsequential to what it does the image of claims of transparency and being corrupt free in form and appearance. Saddening level of public disregard.

On PM: No more talk on Moorings issue

Posted 21 March 2025, 12:15 p.m. Suggest removal

DreamerX says...

If this is your mentality, you are truly lost.

On US visa risk over Cuban workers

Posted 13 March 2025, 9:15 a.m. Suggest removal

DreamerX says...

No. Cuba has had horrendous food shortages and scarcity over the last few years, again and again it happens. You can go to CUBA and be a "morally" good person and leave us alone.

On US visa risk over Cuban workers

Posted 13 March 2025, 9:14 a.m. Suggest removal

DreamerX says...

What contingency plan exists that any sensible citizen would believe that our country is capable of testing chemical leeching for unrecovered parts, handling a fire or cleaning up a residual oil/chemical spill in the ocean? What vessels do we have or can hire to handle this contingency? Is Spacex paying? Is the government making the liability payable out of the supposed maximum 100k per landing costs? Why exactly does Florida not want all this income from SpaceX's welfare checks from NASA?

DreamerX says...

ExposedU2C is one of the least informed commenters on this board.

DreamerX says...

Dexter from my own experience is being shoved into the role of key person on every new issue over the last 3-7 years at DIR. Almost every client matter I've submitted with DIR results in being referred to Dexter or needs his' response. The only issue that he didn't have to make the decision on was a client's Large Tax Payer audit deadline, that Dexter further referred us to the final overarching authority within DIR. It's also not a plainly available the organizational chart of DIR.

DreamerX says...

This is truth. Especially in the weird urgent manner they keep adding more requirements. Such as when they required Large Tax payers to have audited financials. Some of which are large in gross revenue but have little profit margins, now had 5 months to start their frist audit, by firms ill equipped to understand 15-30 years of unaudited business and DIR being woefully understaffed.

They had real opportunities to publish forthwith a book or document on all the new requirements to come in the 3-5 years. But, I don't believe they even know what's happening in the next few months. They expect these entities to expend immediate resources at the looming threat of their "Tax Compliance Certificate" and other penalties.