What contingency plan exists that any sensible citizen would believe that our country is capable of testing chemical leeching for unrecovered parts, handling a fire or cleaning up a residual oil/chemical spill in the ocean? What vessels do we have or can hire to handle this contingency? Is Spacex paying? Is the government making the liability payable out of the supposed maximum 100k per landing costs? Why exactly does Florida not want all this income from SpaceX's welfare checks from NASA?
Dexter from my own experience is being shoved into the role of key person on every new issue over the last 3-7 years at DIR. Almost every client matter I've submitted with DIR results in being referred to Dexter or needs his' response. The only issue that he didn't have to make the decision on was a client's Large Tax Payer audit deadline, that Dexter further referred us to the final overarching authority within DIR. It's also not a plainly available the organizational chart of DIR.
This is truth. Especially in the weird urgent manner they keep adding more requirements. Such as when they required Large Tax payers to have audited financials. Some of which are large in gross revenue but have little profit margins, now had 5 months to start their frist audit, by firms ill equipped to understand 15-30 years of unaudited business and DIR being woefully understaffed.
They had real opportunities to publish forthwith a book or document on all the new requirements to come in the 3-5 years. But, I don't believe they even know what's happening in the next few months. They expect these entities to expend immediate resources at the looming threat of their "Tax Compliance Certificate" and other penalties.
The problem is Mr. Fernander is barely available for any complex questions since he's the key person for most of the new issues with DIR. The department is also carelessly understaffed by "authorized" personnel who can make these guidance or decisions. Filers are stuck with the chance of making errors and being penalized in various ways.
So you are doing nothing. Good to know you are just a blowhard. No real care other than doing exactly what you accused the opposition of. Nothing of value.
DreamerX says...
What contingency plan exists that any sensible citizen would believe that our country is capable of testing chemical leeching for unrecovered parts, handling a fire or cleaning up a residual oil/chemical spill in the ocean? What vessels do we have or can hire to handle this contingency? Is Spacex paying? Is the government making the liability payable out of the supposed maximum 100k per landing costs? Why exactly does Florida not want all this income from SpaceX's welfare checks from NASA?
On ALL SYSTEMS GO: DPM says safeguards in place as Bahamas set for as many as 20 SpaceX rocket landings in 2025
Posted 13 February 2025, 12:15 p.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
ExposedU2C is one of the least informed commenters on this board.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 8:17 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
Dexter from my own experience is being shoved into the role of key person on every new issue over the last 3-7 years at DIR. Almost every client matter I've submitted with DIR results in being referred to Dexter or needs his' response. The only issue that he didn't have to make the decision on was a client's Large Tax Payer audit deadline, that Dexter further referred us to the final overarching authority within DIR. It's also not a plainly available the organizational chart of DIR.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 8:15 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
This is truth. Especially in the weird urgent manner they keep adding more requirements. Such as when they required Large Tax payers to have audited financials. Some of which are large in gross revenue but have little profit margins, now had 5 months to start their frist audit, by firms ill equipped to understand 15-30 years of unaudited business and DIR being woefully understaffed.
They had real opportunities to publish forthwith a book or document on all the new requirements to come in the 3-5 years. But, I don't believe they even know what's happening in the next few months. They expect these entities to expend immediate resources at the looming threat of their "Tax Compliance Certificate" and other penalties.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 8:08 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
The problem is Mr. Fernander is barely available for any complex questions since he's the key person for most of the new issues with DIR. The department is also carelessly understaffed by "authorized" personnel who can make these guidance or decisions. Filers are stuck with the chance of making errors and being penalized in various ways.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 8:03 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
"Bring the ghetto to cable beach" Homie delusional.
On $300m Luxury hotel promises 1,000 jobs
Posted 10 February 2025, 8:12 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
It's okay. Keep doing nothing.
On Pintard seeks probe over CCA payments
Posted 3 January 2025, 10:22 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
Biggest Bot.
On CCA says Supreme Court ruling in Baha Mar case ‘deeply flawed’
Posted 3 January 2025, 10:22 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
So you are doing nothing. Good to know you are just a blowhard. No real care other than doing exactly what you accused the opposition of. Nothing of value.
On Pintard seeks probe over CCA payments
Posted 28 December 2024, 6:49 a.m. Suggest removal
DreamerX says...
What else can the opposition do? What are you doing?
On Pintard seeks probe over CCA payments
Posted 27 December 2024, 8:18 p.m. Suggest removal