This is disgraceful. Had this alleged case happen in any other civilized country, Mr. Davis would have had to resigned and at minimum charged for conflict of interest or perhaps for obtaining by means of false pretence. The character of the woman does not lend any legal justification for the alleged conduct of the DPM. What kind of people are we? Why do we make moral equivalence for this egregious and unethical conduct by the second most powerful (arguably) in this country. If leadership cannot be trusted how do we expect the followers to act? Are we becoming a Banana republic where the powerful can never be wrong?
Generalsense says...
This is disgraceful. Had this alleged case happen in any other civilized country, Mr. Davis would have had to resigned and at minimum charged for conflict of interest or perhaps for obtaining by means of false pretence. The character of the woman does not lend any legal justification for the alleged conduct of the DPM. What kind of people are we? Why do we make moral equivalence for this egregious and unethical conduct by the second most powerful (arguably) in this country. If leadership cannot be trusted how do we expect the followers to act? Are we becoming a Banana republic where the powerful can never be wrong?
On Law firm defends Deputy PM in claim over $10m estate
Posted 30 July 2014, 8:54 a.m. Suggest removal