If you can—go ahead and show me exactly where in the article a “better deal” was offered. Otherwise, spare us the racist venom and blind allegiance. National decisions should be based on facts and outcomes, not prejudice and misplaced loyalty to powers that have never respected us.

The truth is—you are just a coward, eager to lash out at the weak while staying silent when it’s the powerful doing the damage. Quick to demonize the Haitian trying to feed his family or the Chinese partner offering a deal we negotiated ourselves, but mute when cruise giants rob us blind, foreign-owned dive companies operate tax-free, and international banks funnel profits out while we foot the bill.

It’s easy to shout when the target is poor or foreign. But when it’s the rich, the connected, or the familiar 'white face' doing the exploiting, suddenly everyone forgets how to speak. That’s not patriotism. That’s selective outrage—and it's destroying this country more than any outsider ever could.

Coward, racist and blind!

While some are quick to hurl racist slurs at China and drown in Cold War rhetoric, the real daylight robbery happening in our country is being conveniently ignored—especially when it comes in the form of cruise lines and foreign-owned operations on Bahamian soil. Where’s the outrage over the so-called “private islands” that siphon off millions in tourist revenue while contributing next to nothing to the Bahamian economy? These are foreign-run enclaves operating tax-free, exploiting our natural beauty, and leaving us with crumbs. Their transactions are processed in second countries, completely bypassing our VAT system, even though the operations are based right here in The Bahamas.

Where is the anger about shark diving businesses and other tourism ventures operating in Bahamian waters, using Bahamian resources, while their financial returns are cashed out abroad? Why is no one speaking on this? Is it because the offenders aren’t Chinese or Haitian? Is that what makes exploitation tolerable?

We’re so distracted calling China racist, we fail to see who’s picking our pockets in broad daylight. The problem isn’t just foreign powers—it’s our silence, our double standards, and the refusal to confront the systems and deals that actually bleed this country dry. We should demand accountability, not just from foreign partners, but from those who sit in boardrooms and Cabinet offices, and sign away our future for campaign kickbacks and private gain.

Until we’re brave enough to talk about all the bad deals—not just the ones involving China or Haiti—we’re not ready to fix anything.

Ah yes—when all else fails, throw out a lazy, racist jab and hope it sticks. “ChiComs,” really? That outdated Cold War slur says more about your ignorance than it does about China. And while you're busy preaching about what the Chinese allegedly think of gays, Blacks, or anyone who isn't them, maybe take a hard look in your own backyard.

The truth is, no Chinese official ever enslaved our people, drew up Jim Crow laws, ran apartheid colonies in the Caribbean, or set immigration quotas to keep Black Bahamians out of Florida. No Chinese ambassador ever called us “shithole countries,” or threatened to bomb us over immigration. That would be your so-called "democratic allies."

Bahamians don't need lectures from racists dressed up as freedom fighters. We know how to weigh relationships based on results, not recycled bigotry. China built roads, ports, airports, and hospitals in this region. They didn’t ask us to change our religion, parade their ideology in our schools, or tie their aid to moral blackmail.

We are not pawns in your geopolitical tantrum. We will decide who we work with—not based on your approval, but on the interest of the Bahamian people. And if that offends you, maybe you're the one who needs to save your breath.

Fact check:

Debt‑trap diplomacy” claims – what the data show:-

*** A peer‑reviewed survey of 1,100 Chinese loans finds no instance of Beijing seizing a sovereign asset for non‑payment; when borrowers run into trouble, the norm is to reschedule or refinance.*** The Atlantic

- Zambia. Viral reports that China would grab Lusaka’s Kenneth Kaunda International Airport were formally denied by the Zambian cabinet in 2018; no transfer has occurred. - Lusaka Times

- Madagascar. Chinese debt is ≈ 3‑4 % of Madagascar’s external liabilities, well below distress thresholds, and no ports, mines or islands have changed hands. - china observers

- Malaysia. The East Coast Rail Link was renegotiated in 2019, cutting the cost by one‑third; Malaysia kept full ownership and operational control. - Radio Free Asia

- Sri Lanka’s Hambantota lease—often cited as Exhibit A—was a 99‑year commercial concession, not an asset seizure triggered by default, and Colombo used the proceeds to bolster its foreign‑exchange reserves. Independent scholarship notes the arrangement was initiated by Sri Lanka, not demanded by Beijing. - Harvard Business School

*****

It is disappointing—but not surprising—to witness yet another recycled diatribe parroting Western propaganda about Chinese development, cloaked in faux patriotism and masquerading as economic wisdom. The author speaks of “empirical facts,” yet offers none. Instead, they rely on exaggerated hypotheticals, lazy generalizations, and fear-inducing narratives that have been debunked by international development scholars, financial watchdogs, and governments alike.

This constant reference to the so-called “debt trap” is a narrative manufactured in think tanks funded by Western geopolitical interests. It is not grounded in data, legal precedent, or development economics. In fact, China’s debt renegotiation pattern has been more flexible than the IMF and Paris Club, who impose austerity measures and political conditions on desperate nations in need.

So the real question is this: who is the bigger threat to our sovereignty? China, who builds roads, bridges, hotels, and ports under state-backed loans? Or the United States, who has armed drones in the sky, military bases in 80 countries, and a documented history of toppling governments from Panama to Grenada to Iraq?

And while we’re at it—when was the last time the British paid a penny in reparations for 200 years of enslaving our ancestors and extracting the wealth that built their empire? Perhaps before we dismiss Chinese investment out of fear of fictional consequences, we should demand compensation from the empire that actually stole from us—and continues to do so through finance, policy, and the Commonwealth charade.

Perhaps it is simply that those of us who proudly claim the name “Bahamian” refuse to fit the caricature of cowardice some would paint. We stand firmly with our government as it defends our sovereignty, unwilling to be brow‑beaten by a United States whose history of racist, genocidal violence abroad reminds us that a single pretext could bring bombs raining down on Nassau in the name of Florida’s “security.” Or perhaps we are merely exercising patient resolve, still awaiting the long‑overdue reparations' cheque from Britain for the centuries of slavery our ancestors endured beneath the Union Jack

... no, I could not find where there was mention of "a better deal" ... what I read is ...' The UK High Commission told The Tribune that its proposal, made earlier this year through UK Export Finance, was intended to match or beat China’s terms on project cost, construction timeline, and repayment conditions.

“As well as the terms being competitive to that of the ***original Chinese offer***, British companies had recent experience of building in the region successfully, and these hospitals were built to be fully compatible with European and American-provided medical equipment and European and American-trained doctors,” the High Commission said.'

Maybe you have a more detailed version of the article, one that is different from what we are all reading here ...?

Please share your version that say "better deal"

Let’s not forget—Bahamians helped build your America, especially South Florida. From agriculture to construction to hospitality, generations of Bahamians laid the foundations of communities that now thrive on our labour and culture. Yet despite this, out of nearly every nation on Earth, the only passport the United States refuses to respect is ours—our Blue Book. Not only do Bahamians require a visa to visit the U.S., but now we’re also forced to pay $500 just to apply for a visa waiver. That’s what "friendship" looks like?

And let’s not pretend the insults stop there. We’ve heard your so-called “leaders,” like the Governor of Florida, openly threaten to bomb The Bahamas over immigration—a statement so vile and cowardly that it should have been condemned by every decent official in that genocidal racist country. But no, we only got silence. That’s the real tone of your diplomacy.

So before you accuse me of “spitting in the eyes of Uncle Sam,” ask yourself: What kind of friend piss on and kicks you, then expects you to kneel and say thank you? Real friendship is built on mutual respect—not fear, not bullying, and certainly not extortion.

Stop being a coward, stop bullying ... protect your sovereignty.

While The Bahamas continues to operate within the framework of a colonial-era political system, the more pressing question is this: when, since independence, has the United Kingdom brought forward any major investment of lasting economic benefit to the Bahamian people? The uncomfortable truth is that British commercial engagement with The Bahamas has been virtually non-existent for decades. Last year, we welcomed fewer than 1,500 UK tourists—despite our so-called "historic ties." That figure alone speaks volumes.

The UK is 4,000 miles away. The emotional and economic distance is even greater. So before anyone questions why we are partnering with China instead of Britain, perhaps the real question should be: Where has Britain been all this time? And what have they done—beyond symbolic honours and polite press statements—to help build schools, roads, hospitals, or trade platforms for the Bahamian people?

This isn’t about who we like—it’s about who shows up. And for too long, the UK simply hasn’t.

... anytime clarity, and not cowardice, is needed, I am here.

Thank you.