First of all the system of crown land is set up in a way,whereas the individuals whom represent land managers (mostly being females),doesn't have a clue as to where crown is located in the Bahamas. There is no detail chart that zones or indicates the availability crown land,therefor the customers suffer because they are in a blindfolded situation. Crown Land does have in place individuals that are very much capable of turning the department around in its efficiency to satisfy customers of whom seek crown land,but for some intentional reason these individuals would be more than likely too efficient in showing up a system that is unfair in its distribution towards the public,so it rather structured in a way that when fingers are pointed out of frustration,it would end up being directed in the area of land management where ignorance and mediocrity strives. First of all applications when processed should be given a tracking number and a 90 day time table for either approval or rejection,presently 6-9 months for just a response is totally unacceptable. Land Managers should be able to properly read maps and also travel to islands to execute proper land inspections,as a matter of fact Land Management should come directly under the area of surveying,for there is great conflict in the duties being carried out as to the present land managers are incapable of meeting the job requirements,so the department of lands and surveys is strategically structured so that the public would have little or no chance in acquiring crown land.............
Leonidas says...
First of all the system of crown land is set up in a way,whereas the individuals whom represent land managers (mostly being females),doesn't have a clue as to where crown is located in the Bahamas. There is no detail chart that zones or indicates the availability crown land,therefor the customers suffer because they are in a blindfolded situation. Crown Land does have in place individuals that are very much capable of turning the department around in its efficiency to satisfy customers of whom seek crown land,but for some intentional reason these individuals would be more than likely too efficient in showing up a system that is unfair in its distribution towards the public,so it rather structured in a way that when fingers are pointed out of frustration,it would end up being directed in the area of land management where ignorance and mediocrity strives. First of all applications when processed should be given a tracking number and a 90 day time table for either approval or rejection,presently 6-9 months for just a response is totally unacceptable. Land Managers should be able to properly read maps and also travel to islands to execute proper land inspections,as a matter of fact Land Management should come directly under the area of surveying,for there is great conflict in the duties being carried out as to the present land managers are incapable of meeting the job requirements,so the department of lands and surveys is strategically structured so that the public would have little or no chance in acquiring crown land.............
On ‘NO RESPONSE’ TO 30,000 CROWN LAND APPLICATIONS
Posted 10 August 2014, 7:17 a.m. Suggest removal