Comment history

Millennial242 says...

Sure, that's a concern. However, it's not something that should derail the entire prospect of developing this industry in The Bahamas. On the scale of SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats), it is a possible threat. However, this is where we do things to mitigate the threat or find other avenues to ensure the way forward can still proceed. Sooooooo respectfully Mr. Bowe, let's not lead with fearmongering. Let's lead with action.

On US 'cut off' fear on marijuana pursuit

Posted 28 October 2020, 1:47 p.m. Suggest removal

Millennial242 says...

"Read the Room" on this one gents. Start making the "serious decisions" now, because when you are allowed to re-open, it will not stop the continued losses. On a global scale, the entire Entertainment industry is facing huge losses. A quick google search can reveal just how bad it is. When the larger markets like Canada and the US start to recover, then add an additional to 8 months for The Bahamas' entertainment industry to recover. Movie theatres aren't an essential need for challenged disposal income budgets. Most folks could justify a gym membership over the movies (because at least their boosting their health during the process). Start making those tough decisions NOW. This will be a long ride.

Millennial242 says...

I appreciate the journalist offering investigative content in this article. By identifying that other grocery stores were able to get rid of their bags in time for the complete ban, it indicates that Mr Roberts should have been able to as well. Sufficient time was given to that effect (COVID or no COVID). We can't blame everything on this virus. all stores (remember it's not just foodstores that offer plastic bags), appear to have had sufficient time.

Millennial242 says...

THIS! This so desperately needs to be addressed. This is stifling any substantial progress for our country to seek gains in the expansion of technology-driven businesses both locally and abroad. Internet fees are ridiculous compared to the rest of the region.

Millennial242 says...

“We advised Mr Woods that we cannot provide transportation at this time, due to the cost involved and that we are looking at all ways to preserve jobs. "

From that one line, it sounds like the hotel sought to temporarily suspend a particular service as opposed to permanently terminating more employees than they already have. I really don't see what more there is to discuss here outside of their initial communication with Mr Woods. Why would he need a 'lengthy / long discussion on it'. This is an "it-is-what-it-is". If anything, the union should be seeing how they can help their members by offering a transportation alternative in the interim. Sounds like Atlantis offered a compromise --> if they keep the transportation service then more folks would have to be terminated to address the cost. The whole world going through these issues...no time for the union to be grandstanding. Some hotels aren't even opening.

On Atlantis cuts staff transport

Posted 18 June 2020, 10:10 a.m. Suggest removal

Millennial242 says...

....your entity has a major client that is 'unable to pay bills as they are due' (i.e., illiquid)..."it's just the way The Bahamas operates"...."I've been at this for 14 years now"......bruh, you're the CFO, it's wild that you're willing to make those statements on a call to shareholders without pushback from analysts questioning you on the call. Whether the customer is a Government-owned entity or not, your company should have something in place to secure the delinquencies...auditors sleeping ey?

Millennial242 says...

Perhaps it's "common business sense" instead of "desperation".

If a business owner is faced with the option of either [1] fold the business; or [2] get a cash injection; there is a strong likelihood that they would take the cash injection (life-line) over allowing the business to immediately fold. There is no comfortable or easy decision.

Many businesses initially dismissed the continuity loan before even reading the details. There is a four-month deferral built into the loan. The loan is direct with the lending institutions and not the government. And guess what...if after four-months things have still not turned around economically, the MSMEs will more than likely have the backing of the government to collectively lobby for more time (since they would represent members of a specific government program, as opposed to a case-by-case loan). On top of the loan, there is an additional grant to help businesses specifically pay their staff. The grant doesn't have to be paid back.

It's never a good position to be in when you need to seek cash injections for your business. However, this is a good deal. Probably the best available right now. Small businesses should take it, while it's available. The only business that should truly consider a different option is a business that was struggling before the COVID-19 pandemic even started to take effect. Those businesses should really consider their overall business model.

On 'Desperation' sparks $20m loan rethink

Posted 23 April 2020, 12:06 a.m. Suggest removal

Millennial242 says...

I am. It works seamlessly for 'some' of the banks, but not all. Not all businesses/customers bank with RBC or SBL. Again, lack of consistency. My feedback here is coming straight from dealing with multiple platforms.

On BPL cash crisis as payments collapse

Posted 30 March 2020, 4:33 p.m. Suggest removal

Millennial242 says...

The VAT filing for March is normally due on April 21. So if this article is correct, then that would mean the filing date has now been moved up. The headline and content don't seem to be accurate.

Millennial242 says...

The quickest way to enhance cash flow ----- **make it as easy as possible for customers to pay you.**

BPL should quickly adjust their policies to make sure it meets the current situation of their customers. Start making calls and put out mass communication on how to make payments during the COVID-19 dilemma....don't just wait until payments stop coming in.

Currently, there is an online portal that businesses can use to make payments, but it only works efficiently under the best of circumstances.

I know of multiple businesses that struggle to retrieve their bills timely and have challenges using the online portal because it was set up under an email address that is no longer available (i.e. a previous accounts clerk that no longer works for the company). Or, businesses that have multiple meters can't get their bills all at once or in the same manner because of some bureaucracy.

The entity needs to revisit their online payment process with a particular focus for the ease of businesses. In appearance, it seems to be well established, but in practice, it is not.

On BPL cash crisis as payments collapse

Posted 30 March 2020, 9:02 a.m. Suggest removal