Sigh... yes I'm aware due process is being carried out. Commenting on her, as yet unproven 'above the law, disrespectful behaviour and disregard for officers of the law' is not giving an opinion... you are stating something as fact with no proof. The use of the word alleged may do you well in future.
Were you at the meeting? Did you hear what the people had to say? The facts and figures? How many people had been drinking contaminated (cancer causing) water for 2 years without being informed? People in that meeting literally being informed right there and then of the health hazards they were facing? - I don't think "they admitted they made a mistake" is enough of an explanation with all due respect. Fitzgerald was the only one who made an unprovoked political attack during that meeting, accusing opposing parties of of "using" the matter for political gain. AND!? I'm shocked that their focus is on what the FNM and DNA are doing rather on on their own failures. Should they not have enough to worry about without having to give speeches attacking the opposing parties!? It's their responsibility to help these people, not try and deflect blame with school yard tactics; "but look they're being bad too!" Absurd behaviour.
I don't understand. A human rights group are in support of a government move which was in support of human rights... and that's suspicious or unusual why?
Also if you click on any of the 'More like this story' links under the main story, you can see Mitchell was wholeheartedly fighting for LGBT rights, why is he not celebrating this? It's definitely something to be celebrated.
I don't know if you've been living under a rock or you're just confused. If a homosexual person can't marry the person they love, how do they have equal rights?
Space says...
what if I'm not illegal and I still don't like it...
On Woman accused of assault on immigration staff involved in fresh confrontation
Posted 21 May 2015, 6:06 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
Sigh... yes I'm aware due process is being carried out. Commenting on her, as yet unproven 'above the law, disrespectful behaviour and disregard for officers of the law' is not giving an opinion... you are stating something as fact with no proof. The use of the word alleged may do you well in future.
On Woman accused of assault on immigration staff involved in fresh confrontation
Posted 21 May 2015, 6:04 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
Ugh... she hasn't even been to trial. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Oh wait I forgot... this is the Bahamas.
On Woman accused of assault on immigration staff involved in fresh confrontation
Posted 20 May 2015, 2 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
Were you at the meeting? Did you hear what the people had to say? The facts and figures? How many people had been drinking contaminated (cancer causing) water for 2 years without being informed? People in that meeting literally being informed right there and then of the health hazards they were facing? - I don't think "they admitted they made a mistake" is enough of an explanation with all due respect. Fitzgerald was the only one who made an unprovoked political attack during that meeting, accusing opposing parties of of "using" the matter for political gain. AND!? I'm shocked that their focus is on what the FNM and DNA are doing rather on on their own failures. Should they not have enough to worry about without having to give speeches attacking the opposing parties!? It's their responsibility to help these people, not try and deflect blame with school yard tactics; "but look they're being bad too!"
Absurd behaviour.
On Rubis uproar
Posted 5 May 2015, 3:43 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
Hmm you could be right, I think it's both to be honest. Not that that makes it a bad thing.
On Mitchell wary of praise by activists over gay rights
Posted 2 April 2015, 2:42 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
you make a good point
On Donna Vasyli denied bail in husband murder case
Posted 2 April 2015, 2:03 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
I don't understand. A human rights group are in support of a government move which was in support of human rights... and that's suspicious or unusual why?
Also if you click on any of the 'More like this story' links under the main story, you can see Mitchell was wholeheartedly fighting for LGBT rights, why is he not celebrating this? It's definitely something to be celebrated.
On Mitchell wary of praise by activists over gay rights
Posted 2 April 2015, 1:56 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
moron logic...
On ‘We must co-exist with global views on homosexuality’
Posted 31 March 2015, 3:06 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
I have to say I'm with you. The pendulum is swinging the other way. Change is happening and it's good.
On ‘We must co-exist with global views on homosexuality’
Posted 31 March 2015, 2:59 p.m. Suggest removal
Space says...
I don't know if you've been living under a rock or you're just confused. If a homosexual person can't marry the person they love, how do they have equal rights?
On ‘We must co-exist with global views on homosexuality’
Posted 31 March 2015, 2:55 p.m. Suggest removal