"*Dr Rhianna Neely, said she was advised that no heavy parts of the rocket were dropped into Bahamian waters*"

What's the point of DEPP's oversight? They only report what they're told.

To be fair to them noone involved in this process, nobody, has any really knowledge of space rockets, their operation or fallout. Lots of nice pictures and PR but that's it. What can they do but accept face value anything theyre told?

And.. I saw that Puerto Rico has an island wide blackout today that they estimate will be resolved in 48 to 72 hours. I seemed to recall that an American company was responsible for their Grid so i looked it up...

Wikipedia.com:
*LUMA Energy officially became the new operator for Puerto Rico's power grid on June 1, 2021. LUMA is in charge of operating the distribution and transmission infrastructure, although they do not own it, nor do they own or operate the power generation sector. The takeover happened as part of an agreement with Puerto Rico's **Public-Private Partnership** Agreement (*in an effort to overcome PREPA's bankruptcy)***

*Wednesday, June 16, 2021, a massive power outage left more than 337,000 clients without electricity after three units went offline unexpectedly.*

*the LUMA official stated that since assuming responsibility in 2021, LUMA has worked to enhance reliability and resiliency despite **inheriting a grid weakened by years of neglect***

*February 2025, LUMA announced plans to add nearly 1 GW of renewable energy and over 700 MW of storage, attracting $4 billion in private investment.That same month, the company reached an agreement with Linxon US LLC and AtkinsRéalis Caribe to build nine energy interconnection points, adding 990 MW of clean energy and 700 MW of storage to the grid.*

*Despite these developments, LUMA continues to face challenges, including energy supply issues.*

They could replace the words LUMA and Puerto Rico. Lofty promises, huge contract, grid failures, island blackouts, grid "disturbances" and *we inherited legacy problems you know*

Fed Chairman Powell said today of the US economy, higher unemployment, higher inflation, higher prices, lower growth. They have no idea how the economy will react because such a devastating attack on all economic fronts has *never been done executing by any one before. The greatest attack ever*

*just a little pain*

Undercover is not entrapment

"*appears, on the surface, to involve entrapment.*"

I feel really sorry for the people Mr Davis addressed these remarks to, because he has to believe they're utter illiterates.

No defence lawyer can speak about appearance of entrapment "*on the surface*". There is nothing "*surface*" about it. It is a technical defense that a lawyer has to prove to a judge thar a sequence of events bears out.

Btw, "Entrapment" and "*caught in an undercover operation*" are two completely different things. Heard some people saying "clear entrapment". And they een see no transcript yet. Boy...

Anyway the PM and his supporters can take comfort in the entire episode being on video, it will be clear who enticed who and the name of the high ranking politician to boot

I am also not saying the conclusion isnt correct. I am saying there are too many unexplained odd circumstances to just leave the report as "he drowned"

He did not "tell them what to do". He did what any responsible lawyer does when their client suggests theyve been negatively impacted by another party *and* they believe the police have not done a thorough job. He "*questioned*"

"*When one looks at the press release that was done by the Royal Bahamas Police Force, it seems very inconclusive and very unprofessional*"

You did arrive yesterday apparently. Lawyers review and question police reports all over the world every single day

"*But mr seymour has no right to say*"

Did you arrive on the planet yesterday?

Mr Seymour is the family's attorney. He has every right to question everything.

"*still waiting for forensic toxicology results*"

What about the bruising on the body. It is possible to beat someone up, throw them in the water unconscious or even hold their head under water and they then die from "drowning", which would be consistent with cause of death. The reference to toxicology is also fine but neither explains the state of the body. Was the body bruised or not and if so did the bruising occur before or after death?

*Sometime earlier, between 2am and 3am, officers reportedly visited the family’s hotel room, alleging Dinari had "spat on staff"—a claim the family vehemently denies*

*When one looks at the press release that was done by the Royal Bahamas Police Force, it seems very inconclusive and very unprofessional,*

*Dinari does not go to the beach. We just came from Punta Cana in January. He did not go to the beach. He is not a beach person*

This entire saga has been bungled from the start.

1. I have never ever ever heard of a scenario where the police can refuse to let a family view their loved ones body. They can certainly warn you if the body is in a bad state and leave it as your choice. But offering a head shot photo as basis for identification this is beyond weird.

2.In a previous article there was some reference to Danari possibly spitting on hotel staff but it was some inconclusive hearsay on who said it and how they knew of the incident. This story implies it was **officers** who **came to the hotel room** to deliver this storyline. Does "officers" mean RBPF or hotel security guards? If police, did they have on cameras? Does the hotel cctv show the "officers" at the room?

3.I agree with the attorney, the way that the report was delivered to the public via the crime report, it made it seem as if the autopsy results were conclusive. I was shocked to read the mothers account of bruising on the body and being prevented from viewing the body.

4.This young man was missing maybe from 10pm to 5AM. I'm told that 24hr hours submerged in water is not sufficient time for water related physical distortions. The timeline was 7hours max and he wasnt even found in the water. Somebody needs to be responsible and give a believable explanation. Examiners can determine if bruises occur before or after death so its not some we cant determine what happened situation.

5.In the other story the mother said Dinari *went to get a jacket* and never returned. In this story she says he was *not a beach person* and cites a recent vacation example to back it up. Put together, its beyond weird from him to have been found "drowned" on the beach. The police need to clear all of this up.

The story is all over the US news.