"**credible evidence that the Bahamian government is responsible for directing unauthorised access to the debtors’ systems for the purpose of obtaining digital assets of the debtors – that took place after the commencement of these cases.”**
**This statement appears to be correct. Doesnt the govt have 3 arms?** The executive, the legislature and the judiciary? So on November 10th bankruptcy was filed and in November 12th, "**after**" bankruptcy was filed, one arm of the govt issued an order directing SBF to assist with moving funds "*to obtain digital assets of debtors*". This is 100% factually correct. I assume their whole case is on "*unauthorized*"...
This is ALL too late. I cant do your job, but if you have it you should be able to do it and explain what's happening. Clearly 3 weeks later theyre realizing their *say nothing, Bahamian people will lose focus, we can move on to the next thing without giving any answers*, modus operandi strategy is failing abysmally... because now you on the world stage and it looks like **nobody** had a handle on the company while it was operating or 3 weeks later
"*Sir Franklyn, meanwhile, said FTX’s collapse did not necessarily mean there were weaknesses or deficiencies in The Bahamas’ regulatory regime. “Sometimes businesses fail.*"
But this business didnt just "*fail*" due to an unfavourable business environment, it appears that there were some really careless and suspect actions by the owners and a failure to recognize the signs by the SCB.
Sometimes businesses are reckless and noone is watching. That sums up this situation
"*The decisions made by FTX rest on the shoulders of FTX. Not one Bahamian was responsible for..*"
Wrong. Not one **Barbadian** was responsible for the decisions FTX made because they rejected their request to operate in their jurisdiction with such a sloppily put together governance structure. **We the biblical prostitute** who allows all comers no matter who they are as long as they have money, **are very much responsible. It happened under our watch while we slept. The SC was about a year late to act.**
**It's so interesting that we take this position that we had nothing to do with it. But for years now we've talked about the parents who see their kids coming home with unexplained nice things and ask no questions**
Ridiculous, what are they doing to stop people, running red lights, scooting out in front of right way traffic under *turn left on red*, making a 3rd lane on a double lane highway, going around a car to turn left on red, using the turning lane to jump a line, using blue hill road into bay as a merge lane instead of properly joining the queue. Theyre literally doing nothing.
Unfortunately, this is not crying wolf. It is mind boggling that with the cost of energy being one of the most critical issues in the country, somebody unnamed could reject a cabinet paper and not inform the PM, the minister responsible, or cabinet, for months on end. They didnt speak up when they heard the issue brought up in the house and allowed both ministers to give incorrect information to the bahamian public. Who is in charge of the country? Who is the PM reporting to? When we find out, all of our electric charge increases should be placed on their bill
Its a bit deeper than whether they misled the house.
The questions I have, how does a cabinet paper get written? Who requests it? Was it this one started before or after the new govt came in? Then after its completed what process does it go through? Addressing a letter to a minister or the Prime Minister doesnt necessarily mean the minister or Prime Minister reads it. Someone at the gate determines what they do and do not see. So Id like to see the journey of a generic cabinet paper and then the journey that this paper took.
The bigger question I have in light of the debacle on price control, minimum wage, BPL and FTX is who is really running the country, or corunning the country. I get the impression that Brave Davis just read what was put in front of him, he did not even known that 38 products he spoke of were actually 38 categories translating into 3000+ items, the basics of the analysis. Im not suggesting that Mr Davis isnt working there are a thousand issues other than these 4 that he has to attend to, but these were big ones with a huge impact. So who made these decisions? Was it Fitzgerald or Wilson or someone else? Thats the danger, and it always was, the man who has the leaders ear, the man behind the curtain.
Im not tied to either party but I appreciate facts. I doubt the FNM *wrote the book* on "crooked". They took power for the first time in 97. We went all through 25 drug years ...Norman's Cay, Joe Leader ... under Pindlings leadership
ThisIsOurs says...
What are you talking about now? This is about FTX
On Sir Franklyn: FTX is ‘not our first rodeo’
Posted 26 November 2022, 2:16 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"**credible evidence that the Bahamian government is responsible for directing unauthorised access to the debtors’ systems for the purpose of obtaining digital assets of the debtors – that took place after the commencement of these cases.”**
**This statement appears to be correct. Doesnt the govt have 3 arms?** The executive, the legislature and the judiciary? So on November 10th bankruptcy was filed and in November 12th, "**after**" bankruptcy was filed, one arm of the govt issued an order directing SBF to assist with moving funds "*to obtain digital assets of debtors*". This is 100% factually correct. I assume their whole case is on "*unauthorized*"...
On AG says govt did not seize assets from FTX
Posted 26 November 2022, 2:08 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
This is ALL too late. I cant do your job, but if you have it you should be able to do it and explain what's happening. Clearly 3 weeks later theyre realizing their *say nothing, Bahamian people will lose focus, we can move on to the next thing without giving any answers*, modus operandi strategy is failing abysmally... because now you on the world stage and it looks like **nobody** had a handle on the company while it was operating or 3 weeks later
On AG says govt did not seize assets from FTX
Posted 26 November 2022, 2:02 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"*Sir Franklyn, meanwhile, said FTX’s collapse did not necessarily mean there were weaknesses or deficiencies in The Bahamas’ regulatory regime. “Sometimes businesses fail.*"
But this business didnt just "*fail*" due to an unfavourable business environment, it appears that there were some really careless and suspect actions by the owners and a failure to recognize the signs by the SCB.
Sometimes businesses are reckless and noone is watching. That sums up this situation
On Sir Franklyn: FTX is ‘not our first rodeo’
Posted 25 November 2022, 6:23 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"*The decisions made by FTX rest on the shoulders of FTX. Not one Bahamian was responsible for..*"
Wrong. Not one **Barbadian** was responsible for the decisions FTX made because they rejected their request to operate in their jurisdiction with such a sloppily put together governance structure. **We the biblical prostitute** who allows all comers no matter who they are as long as they have money, **are very much responsible. It happened under our watch while we slept. The SC was about a year late to act.**
**It's so interesting that we take this position that we had nothing to do with it. But for years now we've talked about the parents who see their kids coming home with unexplained nice things and ask no questions**
On EDITORIAL: The two stories of the FTX collapse
Posted 23 November 2022, 12:55 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"*Be careful’ urge police after new road deaths*"
Ridiculous, what are they doing to stop people, running red lights, scooting out in front of right way traffic under *turn left on red*, making a 3rd lane on a double lane highway, going around a car to turn left on red, using the turning lane to jump a line, using blue hill road into bay as a merge lane instead of properly joining the queue. Theyre literally doing nothing.
On Davis: FNM ‘crying wolf’ on BPL issue
Posted 22 November 2022, 6:13 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
what are you talking about?
On Davis: FNM ‘crying wolf’ on BPL issue
Posted 22 November 2022, 5:04 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
Unfortunately, this is not crying wolf. It is mind boggling that with the cost of energy being one of the most critical issues in the country, somebody unnamed could reject a cabinet paper and not inform the PM, the minister responsible, or cabinet, for months on end. They didnt speak up when they heard the issue brought up in the house and allowed both ministers to give incorrect information to the bahamian public. Who is in charge of the country? Who is the PM reporting to? When we find out, all of our electric charge increases should be placed on their bill
On Davis: FNM ‘crying wolf’ on BPL issue
Posted 22 November 2022, 12:06 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
Its a bit deeper than whether they misled the house.
The questions I have, how does a cabinet paper get written? Who requests it? Was it this one started before or after the new govt came in? Then after its completed what process does it go through? Addressing a letter to a minister or the Prime Minister doesnt necessarily mean the minister or Prime Minister reads it. Someone at the gate determines what they do and do not see. So Id like to see the journey of a generic cabinet paper and then the journey that this paper took.
The bigger question I have in light of the debacle on price control, minimum wage, BPL and FTX is who is really running the country, or corunning the country. I get the impression that Brave Davis just read what was put in front of him, he did not even known that 38 products he spoke of were actually 38 categories translating into 3000+ items, the basics of the analysis. Im not suggesting that Mr Davis isnt working there are a thousand issues other than these 4 that he has to attend to, but these were big ones with a huge impact. So who made these decisions? Was it Fitzgerald or Wilson or someone else? Thats the danger, and it always was, the man who has the leaders ear, the man behind the curtain.
On INSIGHT: Was the House of Assembly misled?
Posted 22 November 2022, 3:32 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
Im not tied to either party but I appreciate facts. I doubt the FNM *wrote the book* on "crooked". They took power for the first time in 97. We went all through 25 drug years ...Norman's Cay, Joe Leader ... under Pindlings leadership
On Pintard calls for Sears to resign
Posted 19 November 2022, 6:10 p.m. Suggest removal