The government is quick to put down the validity of this study, but has produced nothing to counter what they have presented. Mr. Rolle, please give us the facts since you claim this man is only making speculations.

@ rory You did not say anything about judgement, you PASSED judgement on the Muslims ... that is worse than saying it.

There is no sense in having a discussion with you because you are always right and everyone else is either bending to an ideology or simply dumb ... only you have sense. FYI, this "religion of peace" Islamist, "Al Qaeda lone wolf" that you accused of/credited with the attack was a Bhuddist with mental illness (medically diagnosed) who claimed he suffered because of prejudice he experienced during his time in the Navy. You may make more sense if you base your opinions on the facts and not just on some spur of the moment bigoted/prejudiced stimuli. I would love to hear your song when you are the one wrongly accused or stereotyped ... I bet you would not like it then.

Following your logic, everytime there is a murder in this country, I guess the cops should go out and arrest all young black men between the ages of 18 and 35 since they are the usual suspects. Totally asinine!!!

You just can't help the name calling; can you? I guess that is a sure sign of your intellect. FYI ... I am a Christian and I do not appease anyone. I am a firm believer in justice and fairness and do not support judging persons or groups based on the "obvious probability." One should not jump to judgement even when the available evidence suggests that it might be that person or group. A simple rule of thumb is; if you would not lke it done to you, do not do it to others.

While all the comments above are valid, I believe that if our governement had approached it properly from the begining, it would have gone away by now, but by Fred seeking to lie their way out of the accusations they have dug a hole for us all.

WHAT???? Jumping to conclusion aren't we? Could just as easily have been a disgruntled worker or someone who was smoking dope or someone who did not like how his boss talked to him, or someone who did not like his girlfiend's nail polish colour. Bottom line is, while you may be right in your assertion, your jumping to conclusion on this matter is typical of the kind of hate mongering that goes on which often leads to other issues such as vigilante-ism, etc.

Does the law preclude "official" cars, because if it doesn't then all we are doing is creating a double standard which ALWAYS leads to a breakdown in what we are hoping to accomplish.

Just wondering if all the Judges' cars that I see around here with very dark tint will also get booked ... after all the law is the law and should apply to everyone.

I am a firm believer in the zero tolerance approach to crime as I believe that criminallity is a mindset and that the persons who commit the "small crimes" are the same ones who commit or graduate to the "bigger crimes". That said however, the article states that what is considered too dark will be left up to the individual officer ... this is too subjective and WILL be abused. I wait to see how effective this approach will be. I will take some time this evening to remove my tints even though the guy who did my tinting told me they were a legal grade.

So, once again the law abiding citizens must suffer because of these A**H***s. The tint saves money by reducing the cost of keeping my car cool, it protects my wife and kids when they are in the car alone as predators don't know they are alone, it protects things that I leave in my car from time to time as the theives don't see them, but the rights of the innocent to protect his family and property is not important ... are we heading to a police state???

If our government had properly addressed the issue from the start it would not have become such a big thing now. The only way to credibly fix this is to get rid of Fred and start fresh with a new person in charge. Other than that there will always be the feeling that they are hiding something.