NO. . .the court did not ruled that it was not the case. . .it ruled that he had no case to answer. . .hence the reasoning and grounds for an appeal. . .the judge ruled that the evidence did not convinced her. . .and she think that the case should not go on to the supreme court!! The AG thinks it could. . .hence we have an impasse. . .therefore the supreme court will decide!!!

Bunch of yard chickens them "pickin at pips". . .doing nothing but "brokering they becks on solid ground" . . .een gat one ounce of common sense among the whole bunch!! Hahahahahahahaha. Envy could do a lot of things to some people aye? Making these people make "theysef" look like fools in the face of the planet. Yinna need to look up what is an adhomanic argument? What cause persons to resort to that type of arguments?? Hehehehehehe. . .hohohohohohohoho. . .yinna have reduced yinnasef to a buncha silly jokers. . .the Bahamas silly group. . .

for what?

yea yea yea. . .watching paint dry. . .with this writer. . .whose editorial disagrees with his assessments. . .he just don't have a good grasp of what is going on or he is just playing the ass. . .as for the case of Mr. Frank Smith. . .dr. minnis and all other agencies. . .keep yinna hands off **all**cases that go before our courts. . .they must not follow these yard chicken advises given in that writer's piece or the foolish and juvenile positions of these posters. . .especially mudder-take-sick's. If yinna or the government don't like the court's ruling. . .carry yinna backsides to the appeal court. . .just like the constitution mandates. **Doc need to just stay his behind out of the court's business**. . .he has an AG for that same reason. . .deal with any perceived biases in court rulings as the constitution says to do so. . .

As usual. . .talking nonsense or just plain lying. . .Rogers said that OJ paid him to get back some expensive jewelry and kill the bitch!! Also, you conveniently "blind yasef" to the many persons who OJ told that he killed the bitch. . .vs one man who said that OJ paid him to get some jewelry and kill his wife.

It is because of our corruption levels. . .we don't send the elite. . .see Davis was found in a car with a gun and they were discharged because they did not prove who owned the gun. . .not even the owner of the car. . .none of them knew how that gun got into the car. . .including Mr. Davis' son. There was a case when one MP went to jail. . .because he "collected" money for a judge and "tief" most of it. . .he was "turned" over to police and found with the payoff money. . .the rest is history!! There are multiple MPs discovered to be involved in corruption and all walked off with their "booty". . .not even a slap on the wrists. . .ALL PLPs!!

Most of these posters are not reading or not understanding what they are reading as usual. . .she said nothing about the "flimsiness" of evidence. . .she said that she don't like the witness and the two ministers them "looked" like they did something. . .what she don't know. . .but it looked like they did something. . .is the jist of her ruling!! The fulcrum of her paper was that "justice must not only be done. . .but appears to be done". Then she granted a no- case-to-answer ruling. . .not an acquittal. . .that case is not over. . .the judge seemed "over wroth" with persons against Frank Smith. . .but she was careful to not acquit nor discharge the case. . . an appeal can and will show a case to answer ruling . . . the lil man in the street see "they playing with us man". Even PLPs out here saying "he guilty". Even if the government don't appeal that case. . .Smith is dead as a PLP politician come future. . . and the threshold for civil cases are higher than criminal cases. OJ was acquitted in his criminal case on a set of evidence and found guilty in his civil case using the same evidence. . .he sues and he has to show that the government did not have reasonable evidence to call him to a preliminary review to test the evidence.

Mrs. Wilson is right. . .the department of education is currently ran by a cadre of incompetent political "buddies" left by the PLP government. . .and this government seem "scared" to remove them. . .even though everybody can see the "mess" and poor management skills displayed by the core management team ran by an incompetent, immature and out of control director who has very little management skills, little experiential content knowledge of his portfolio and who response to situations in a petty, spiteful and childish manner!! This government has been warned many times of that "out of control" director. . .how he will destroy many gains made by previous directors. That man will "blow" the whole machine of education in this country. . .but as they seem to be in Bahamian politics. . .it is who ya know. . .not what ya know. . .even if it destroy our primary development unit. . .education!! Many key persons in this country conclude " something een right about that man". . .others are "getting out before he destroys their careers with his petty, spiteful management style. Some persons wonder if doc een "jammin" Lloyd by leaving him saddled with a "wrecking ball" director that not only shoots himself in the foot. . .but he shoots everybody else he do not like in the foot too!! The union is right. . .that department need "airing out". . .but not by persons from the Long Island cartel. . .they are the ones who "slipped" him in that position. . .even after they know that "something een right" with the man!!

This man is so lost and incompetent. . .and think we all are myopic plp supporters. . .he is so lost and childish. He is impossible . . .but we must temper our disdain. . .we used to say some of those same things about Doc. . .now look. . .our country was never this healthy under any government since the UBP!! Davis may be a "magician" in administration. . .but a "bent pole" in being a political leader. . .especially a rogue, tiefing party like the PLP!! He acts like one of them himself. . .defending them when they are caught doing tiefing things!!

The real "problem" in this case for everybody is that the teacher "punched" one of the students in his mouth first. . .as it is on these here Nassau streets. . .he got punched back "in he mouth". . .the teacher in turn attempted to "body slam" the student and hurt his wrist because he body slammed the student wrong. . .the other student "parted" the fight. . .both students were quizzed by police. . .the information put all of them in problems because the teacher hit the student first!! The union want the students "punished" because they "put their hands on a teacher". . .no matter what the teacher did!! That is why the minister "playing hard ball" with the union. . .the teacher is now in danger of getting fired. . .the union making themselves look like fools. . .dumb fools!! The police them are also "dancing around" this issue also in order to not get the teacher fired!! This teacher is like the one who punched a student in his mouth at S.C. McPherson Jr. high school. . .the student who was a "karate man" punched him back. . .body slammed him. . .then told him to cool off!! The union wanted that 14 year old student to be expelled from school for life!! The authority at Department of education told them that the teacher attacked first. . .something all of them were warned never to do. . .they moved the teacher to C. R. Walker school. Another story at C.R. Walker. . .a male teacher grabbed a female student and pulled her by here clothes and her skirt came off in the class. . .she "slapped his head off". . .as student now say. . .the union also wanted the student expelled from school. . .they sat out also for the same reason. . .students should never hit teachers. . .even in self defense!! In all cases they oped to "sit out" until the student is punished!! That female student was transferred to C.C. Sweeting high school where she went on to become an honor scholar!!