Tal, I go to wikipedia, since I did not go to school.
> ******> A VAT, like most taxes, distorts what would have happened without it.*** > Because the price for someone rises the quantity of goods traded > decreases. Correspondingly, some people are worse off by more than the > government is made better off by tax income. That is, more is lost due to > supply and demand shifts than is gained in tax. This is known as a > deadweight loss. If the income lost by the economy is greater than the > government's income; the tax is inefficient. It must be noted that a > VAT and a Non-VAT has the same implications on the microeconomic > model. > > The entire amount of the government's income (the tax revenue) may not be a > deadweight drag, if the tax revenue is used for productive spending or has > positive externalities – in other words, governments may do more than > simply consume the tax income. While distortions occur, consumption taxes > like VAT are often considered superior because they distort incentives to > invest, save and work less than most other types of taxation – in other > words, a VAT discourages consumption rather than production***.
Does it matter what the timetable for implementation is?
The MO of this Government is to keep everything secret, because there is enough fools becoming eligible voters every day who will vote for a t-shirt. Twenty years ago, votes were more expensive.
When this is postponed so will be the revelation of the legislation.
The increase in the cost of living may well cause the people to protest on the street.
This should accomplish the task of keeping VAT a big secret.
November 2013- referendum on the constitution December 2013- Christmas -- the country stops and the junkanoo groups will keep the headlines going till the end of January February 2014-- the valentine's day will keep the men working to buy perfume April 2014- there will be Easter May 2014- the mother's day will keep the men working to buy perfume and refrigerators
As you can see, there is nothing to keep thm distracted in March 2014
Lacking some informed rebuttal, with one side of his mouth, he resorts to the ad hominem:
**“Then, turning to the Nassau Institute study, he blasted: “I find it one of the most extreme, ridiculous and exaggerated pieces of writing I’ve seen from a professional person.”**
In the mean time, the other side of his mouth was saying:
**“A lot of us are reading it because it bashes the Government, not because it’s a meaningful, accurate report. Yes, read it, but read it with an unbiased view,” Mr Lightbourne added**.
The Client might agree to pay cash. No receipt-no VAT. Happens in other countries.
While some appliance companies charge $150.oo to install an appliance, you may fid a retired appliance man to do it for $50. that way you only pay VAT on the parts.
ohdrap4 says...
Tal, I go to wikipedia, since I did not go to school.
> ******> A VAT, like most taxes, distorts what would have happened without it.***
> Because the price for someone rises the quantity of goods traded
> decreases. Correspondingly, some people are worse off by more than the
> government is made better off by tax income. That is, more is lost due to
> supply and demand shifts than is gained in tax. This is known as a
> deadweight loss. If the income lost by the economy is greater than the
> government's income; the tax is inefficient. It must be noted that a
> VAT and a Non-VAT has the same implications on the microeconomic
> model.
>
> The entire amount of the government's income (the tax revenue) may not be a
> deadweight drag, if the tax revenue is used for productive spending or has
> positive externalities – in other words, governments may do more than
> simply consume the tax income. While distortions occur, consumption taxes
> like VAT are often considered superior because they distort incentives to
> invest, save and work less than most other types of taxation – in other
> words, a VAT discourages consumption rather than production***.
On 'I can only survive by more downsizing'
Posted 2 October 2013, 8:29 a.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Since when does anyone listen to what is said at the United Nations?
Do like Rouseff in brazil, she's got cojones.
On Christie gives address at UN General Assembly
Posted 30 September 2013, 3:49 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
The consultants sing for their supper.
Hey, hey, tomorrow is the first of October, Minister Halkitis said that the VAT legislation is coming out his week.
Now, if the VAT was a disaster in Grenada, how come we have Grenadian consultants?
On The consequences of VAT are real
Posted 30 September 2013, 3:33 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Does it matter what the timetable for implementation is?
The MO of this Government is to keep everything secret, because there is enough fools becoming eligible voters every day who will vote for a t-shirt. Twenty years ago, votes were more expensive.
When this is postponed so will be the revelation of the legislation.
The increase in the cost of living may well cause the people to protest on the street.
On Private sector in Tax Coalition talks
Posted 28 September 2013, 1:28 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Let's schedule this referendum on March 15,2014.
This should accomplish the task of keeping VAT a big secret.
November 2013- referendum on the constitution
December 2013- Christmas -- the country stops and the junkanoo groups will keep the headlines going till the end of January
February 2014-- the valentine's day will keep the men working to buy perfume
April 2014- there will be Easter
May 2014- the mother's day will keep the men working to buy perfume and refrigerators
As you can see, there is nothing to keep thm distracted in March 2014
On Oil drilling vote is still planned
Posted 28 September 2013, 8:09 a.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Amen!!!!
On PM: National plan to help country's economy
Posted 27 September 2013, 9:10 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Who is going to collect VAT?
[Tax officials failed to collect £9.6bn in VAT in 2010-11, auditors find][1]
[1]: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201…
On Cutting 1,000 companies to maximise VAT revenues
Posted 26 September 2013, 11:50 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Referndum and Tweedledee
Agreed to have a Tweedledum;
For Tweedledum said Tweedledee
Had spoiled his nice new Referndum
On FNM deputy leader seeks response to BPC comments
Posted 26 September 2013, 2:35 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Lacking some informed rebuttal, with one side of his mouth, he resorts to the ad hominem:
**“Then, turning to the Nassau Institute study, he blasted: “I find it one of the most extreme, ridiculous and exaggerated pieces of writing I’ve seen from a professional person.”**
In the mean time, the other side of his mouth was saying:
**“A lot of us are reading it because it bashes the Government, not because it’s a meaningful, accurate report. Yes, read it, but read it with an unbiased view,” Mr Lightbourne added**.
Unbiased? Really?
**lmaorofl**
On Ministry adviser slams 'ridiculous' Institute VAT study
Posted 26 September 2013, 1:56 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
The Client might agree to pay cash. No receipt-no VAT. Happens in other countries.
While some appliance companies charge $150.oo to install an appliance, you may fid a retired appliance man to do it for $50. that way you only pay VAT on the parts.
On Owner says ‘they’ll have to jail me’ over VAT
Posted 26 September 2013, 1:31 p.m. Suggest removal