The question is do they want to know . What has govts done to enforce and standardized disclosures or modernize campaign finance. The resistance on FOIA tells you enuff. The size of the auditors' general office tells you enough. People tend to work better when they know someone is watching.
I'm not sure why we arent implementing things that have been done and don't require any insane amount of money or effort.
1) the charge is by the SNDY and his grand jury not Dept of State. So the SDNY who is known as the 'Sovereign District' isnt walking around handing this info out. Nor they probably want the info out at the moment.
2) The DOJ either indicts or declines to indict. Only under few limtied circumstances do they get persons invovled who are not named in the indictment. The Mueller report being an example of where a declination occurred but the report and reasoning behind not indicting was released.
3) If an indictment doesnt name someone it means a few things. either a) they dont have enough evidence to bring a case (remember they only bring cases they feel they can win). So it could be they had a tap or an informant and he mentioned this to someone. They looked into it and have no payments or evidence corroborating his claim. b) or they could for all we know be actively investigating it and dont want the name out yet.
4) It may simply just come up during trial or discovery. Although not sure if discovery would matter in this case since if the allegations are true, and the conversation did happen, the defense attorneys would know anyway. I'm sure the defense however would want such a conversation to be suppressed (esp if they dont have enough to bring a charge to the person).
If I get arrested my defense cant be to pull out a video of other people committing crimes.
Further, if there is nothing to see here, why did in no less than a week, you bring a bunch of laws. Obviously you know that is a problem. He said ' We will have change, we will have reform, and we will have action.'. Why do you need these if there is nothing wrong?
Lastly, why even bring up race. The SDNY Attorney who brought the indictment is a black dude himself and also charged Colombians. The SDNY has indicted people of all colors, races and nationalities. How many black Bahamians were indicted by them in the FTX affair?
the last you want is a privately funded inquiry. If it ever turns out to be favourable for anyone, people will say, x or y funded it blah blah. If there is an inquiry it should be publicly funded. it is what it is.
pt_90 says...
that sounds right.
On Way Forward: We’ll prove we’re the real Valley Boys
Posted 15 December 2024, 2:53 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
yea somehow he thinks the court will rule in favour of who wonbest music.
On Way Forward: We’ll prove we’re the real Valley Boys
Posted 13 December 2024, 1:36 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
Well the cat out the bag when we have already branded ourselves as such.
On PM: US hasn’t given corrupt official’s ID
Posted 11 December 2024, 8:34 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
The question is do they want to know . What has govts done to enforce and standardized disclosures or modernize campaign finance. The resistance on FOIA tells you enuff. The size of the auditors' general office tells you enough. People tend to work better when they know someone is watching.
I'm not sure why we arent implementing things that have been done and don't require any insane amount of money or effort.
On PM: US hasn’t given corrupt official’s ID
Posted 11 December 2024, 8:31 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
To add some speculation:
1) the charge is by the SNDY and his grand jury not Dept of State. So the SDNY who is known as the 'Sovereign District' isnt walking around handing this info out. Nor they probably want the info out at the moment.
2) The DOJ either indicts or declines to indict. Only under few limtied circumstances do they get persons invovled who are not named in the indictment. The Mueller report being an example of where a declination occurred but the report and reasoning behind not indicting was released.
3)
If an indictment doesnt name someone it means a few things. either a) they dont have enough evidence to bring a case (remember they only bring cases they feel they can win). So it could be they had a tap or an informant and he mentioned this to someone. They looked into it and have no payments or evidence corroborating his claim.
b) or they could for all we know be actively investigating it and dont want the name out yet.
4) It may simply just come up during trial or discovery. Although not sure if discovery would matter in this case since if the allegations are true, and the conversation did happen, the defense attorneys would know anyway. I'm sure the defense however would want such a conversation to be suppressed (esp if they dont have enough to bring a charge to the person).
On PM: US hasn’t given corrupt official’s ID
Posted 11 December 2024, 2:55 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
The PM is talking out of both sides of his mouth.
If I get arrested my defense cant be to pull out a video of other people committing crimes.
Further, if there is nothing to see here, why did in no less than a week, you bring a bunch of laws. Obviously you know that is a problem. He said ' We will have change, we will have reform, and we will have action.'. Why do you need these if there is nothing wrong?
Lastly, why even bring up race. The SDNY Attorney who brought the indictment is a black dude himself and also charged Colombians. The SDNY has indicted people of all colors, races and nationalities. How many black Bahamians were indicted by them in the FTX affair?
On PM: US hasn’t given corrupt official’s ID
Posted 11 December 2024, 11:10 a.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
the govt decided to not get involved by getting involved.
On AG: JCNP has no authority to postpone or cancel Junkanoo
Posted 9 December 2024, 3:49 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
the last you want is a privately funded inquiry. If it ever turns out to be favourable for anyone, people will say, x or y funded it blah blah. If there is an inquiry it should be publicly funded. it is what it is.
On Minnis: It’s time for a full inquiry
Posted 3 December 2024, 10:43 a.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
we voted the FNM out of office. What did the new guys do to fix the problem since 2021. Both of these parties are to blame.
On Investment fear on corruption charges
Posted 2 December 2024, 4:42 p.m. Suggest removal
pt_90 says...
this is a new article. The first one was his statement.
https://www.tribune242.com/news/2024/de…
On ‘We must rebuild trust in police’
Posted 2 December 2024, 2:09 p.m. Suggest removal