"I hope that Mr Smith will reflect on what he said, accept that the said statements are false and publicly acknowledge this with a full and unqualified apology,” she said.

The Attorney General said that if Mr Smith fails to take advantage of the opportunity to correct the “egregious wrong” that he has committed against her, she reserved the right to take “ further action.”

“The power to take over, continue and discontinue proceedings at any stage before judgment is vested in the attorney general alone, to the exclusion of anyone. In the exercise of the powers conferred upon me, I as the Attorney General am not subject to the discretion or control of any other person or authority.”-Ms Maynard-Gibson

In this particular case whereby one has the benefit of the reading of his own words ( in this publication for example) and the videos of the antics and harm done by Mr Keod Smith, it would appear that anyone would be hard pressed not to bring him up on charges; but to charge the man for whom he has committed battery against?
And then to use one's office to threaten that person for his protests?
And where is the wrong claimed to have been done to the Ag's office? If we cast about for examples of said office's interference with police, in highly charged cases etc. we need look no further than...say to the recent nolle prosequi cases of well connected drug dealers/murderers like Daniel Ayo or former clients gun/drug smugglers George and Janice Hayles whose files might present an embarrassment to this lofty office holder upon presentation in court
I cannot imagine Ms Maynard Gibson in a role of "advising the police", and I do not think Mr Fred Smith presumes to accuse her of such, rather she tells them what to do.
In her own words she is "not subject to control of any persons or authority", yet how do these controversial decisions to come to be made through her hand?
In this society that is a very dangerous challenge to those seeking justice... or to anyone intent on merely pointing out the obvious and the ridiculous.

True, but Freddie has a few competitors for that Crown

isnt this the same fool who to intended to bring onboard a plane a Smith & Wesson .38mm and it was stolen by LPA baggage handlers?

what a porky piggy

I I cannot believe that any person let alone an officer of the court would be so foolish as to ccarry a loaded firarm onto a planeor that he should be allowed to do so although I assume he used his "status" in order to do what an ordinary citizen could not: get away with such breach of security. Someone should hold him accountable or/and he should resign for putting everyone on that plane at risk because of his careless disregard for public safety.

please read how members of "Pastor" Long's church fared after investing with Ephren Taylor former owner of the now bankrupt New City Capital and now charged by the SEC with fleecing churchgoers out of $11 million in a Ponzi scheme.
Long and his church rec'd a percentage of the sales to his own church's members in Taylor's popular 'building wealth tour' and the "machines" he was selling.
According to the SEC, more than 100 investors including from the New Birth church bought the notes, while more than 250 investors bought the machines. It said the scheme ran from 2008 until late 2010, when new funds dried up."
Incredibly these churchgoers across the country bought $4 million of these machines that were in casino gaming machines that promised tremendous profits- apparently 72-2400%!
10 of the members of Long's New Birth Missionary Baptist Chirch have sued him for the loss of their $1 million investment
Is this a case of reaping what you sowed?
a