Bahamians talk about the facts that fathers are not involve in the child life and this is both the fault of the government as well as the father because the father have a moral obligation to be in his child life, but the government don't charge enough child support to fathers in the country. If fathers start seeing enough of their checks going to child support they would feel more obligated to be in their life also if they don't pay then they need to be lock up because most of them are probably involve in other crimes anyway. Now men will start to pay attention to where they sow their oaths, because it isn't hard to prove who is the father and trust me now the police will have ammunition against a lot of criminals and these defense lawyers wouldn't have much of a case to defend.

There still have to be some intergrity to the process or innocent people will confess to crimes that they didn't commit and don't say no one would because this have been proven over and over that people will say anything if the punishment is to great. Now something have to be done about crimes in the Bahamas.

If numbers is illegal then he just confess to doing it, I guess there is no enforcing the law in the Bahamas.

They could be blowing smoke but changes don't happen overnight.

I think before Branville state what the DNA is going to do he should state where he stand on the issue of the FNM trying to recruit him, saying what the DNA will do for next five years isn't saying what you're going to do. I think it will be a shame for him to jump ship because I think the country will be looking for something different providing he get some good tested candidates.

I'm not denying that this argument is petty, but what i'm saying is that he got more out of it than most of these other argument like who bribe voters because certain things is acceptable in Bahamian society, everyone knows bribery is wrong, but it is still acceptable and most people believe that both parties is doing it anyway. Scandles like what Shane Gibson had with Anna Nicole Smith is also acceptable in Bahamian society so talking about those stuff doesn't make sense, but when you bring up old wounds like the UPB and show someone who was associated with it, and try to convince people that this man didn't really change his stripes, that could hurt Mr. Lightbourne with the old voters because most Bahamians don't forget.

It wasn't a law in the first place to outlaw it, and see if it will become one. The only difference between Bran and the other two guys is they don't say where they stand on that issue of marital rape, the only two government that the Bahamas has had is the FNM and PLP so why isn't it a law yet?

In the body of the letter the example was a definite comparison between easy and hard, also the order that it was in starting from easy to hard, so if the writer use PGC name first and HAI name second draw a common since conclusion; if the example was definite than the real world scenario has to be definite also.

He is trying to plant bad seed against Mr. Lightbourne and I think it work because voters could see Mr. Lightbourne as a UPB loyalist and only change party because he had no choice, also Ryan Pinder is showing that his family repented from being part of the UPB without force. One could say that is old news but he still get something accomplish by doing it.

I gratefully accept your corrections