She is not a "former Bahamian rocket scientist". Firstly: 1) she is still a Bahamian, not formerly was one. So, if you wanted to indicate that she was a former rocket scientist, then you should have said a "Bahamian former rocket scientist".
Which leads to problem 2 - she is not a former rocket scientist. She will always be a rocket scientist. She is just no longer employed with NASA. It's like saying a CPA holder is no longer an accountant because he/she does not work at an accounting firm. The person is still an accountant.
I am trying to figure out why the ineptness of the Port Authority -- across multiple governments, including the FNM -- has anything to do with Fred Mitchell.
So, can the writer of this amateurish piece explain: a) what was the public discussion about the appointment? b) what is the potential mischief? c) what did the police say in respond to the so-called public discussion?
This does not go far enough. In my view, the current "leaders" of the Dundas - Nicholette, Phillip, et al - should be removed from managing the Dundas. It is clear they have no idea how to operate, manage and perpetuate a what-should-be world class theatre. The government should take over operations, really commit to injecting money into the theatre and expand it. Burrows et al, with their vanity and hubris, treat the Dundas as their personal project, alienating the scores of Bahamians that are interested in the arts. But of course, like the elitist that they are, when they need money, they come running to the government for support.
So, Kevin spends the first half of this article defending Hubert's short-sighted, narrow and inaccurate adoption of the IPLHA - only to then conclude with the assertion that he did not agree with the adoption of said Act. Look, Hubert made a mistake with IPLHA, it is quite fine to acknowledge this. To date, Hubert's IPLHA remains the single most insidious legislation adopted by Bahamian politicians. As the young kids say: "change my mind!"
As for the rest of his revisionist FNM history: I just don't have enough plungers to sift through that "stuff".
I was going to reply to this bloviated nonsense, because I thought you had an understanding of financial services. However, after your first paragraph, it is clear that you have no understanding of either CESRA or the reason that it was adopted. And, based on your comments on this and other boards, you don't have the self-reflection to admit that you may be ignorant. So, I'll let you merrily roll along.
tetelestai says...
She is not a "former Bahamian rocket scientist". Firstly: 1) she is still a Bahamian, not formerly was one. So, if you wanted to indicate that she was a former rocket scientist, then you should have said a "Bahamian former rocket scientist".
Which leads to problem 2 - she is not a former rocket scientist. She will always be a rocket scientist. She is just no longer employed with NASA. It's like saying a CPA holder is no longer an accountant because he/she does not work at an accounting firm. The person is still an accountant.
Man, today's journalists are awful.
Editors are worse.
On Norman’s Cay ‘sold out’ on SpaceX’s booster landing
Posted 19 February 2025, 4:18 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
I am trying to figure out why the ineptness of the Port Authority -- across multiple governments, including the FNM -- has anything to do with Fred Mitchell.
On ‘Immigration irrelevant to Freeport’s economic issues’
Posted 18 February 2025, 3:53 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
It appears the CEO stole your girlfriend when you were in high school.
Your pathetic vitriol is embarrassing for a so-called adult.
On Fidelity asserts no ‘one-year wonder’: Eyeing $20m profit
Posted 18 February 2025, 3:33 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
I believe Fred stole your significant other in a previous lifetime. Your obsession with him borders on fanatical.
On ‘Passport verification process weakened by outside decision’
Posted 13 February 2025, 3:37 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
This is such an awfully written article.
So, can the writer of this amateurish piece explain: a) what was the public discussion about the appointment? b) what is the potential mischief? c) what did the police say in respond to the so-called public discussion?
Sheesh.
On Skippings heads to new post in command of South-Central Division
Posted 12 February 2025, 3:37 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
This does not go far enough. In my view, the current "leaders" of the Dundas - Nicholette, Phillip, et al - should be removed from managing the Dundas. It is clear they have no idea how to operate, manage and perpetuate a what-should-be world class theatre. The government should take over operations, really commit to injecting money into the theatre and expand it. Burrows et al, with their vanity and hubris, treat the Dundas as their personal project, alienating the scores of Bahamians that are interested in the arts. But of course, like the elitist that they are, when they need money, they come running to the government for support.
On Dundas Centre for Performing Arts receives $340k funding from govt
Posted 12 February 2025, 3:35 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Agreed - this should be a good year for The Bahamas capital markets in general.
On Solar provider eyes up to $100m raise
Posted 11 February 2025, 3:35 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
So, Kevin spends the first half of this article defending Hubert's short-sighted, narrow and inaccurate adoption of the IPLHA - only to then conclude with the assertion that he did not agree with the adoption of said Act. Look, Hubert made a mistake with IPLHA, it is quite fine to acknowledge this. To date, Hubert's IPLHA remains the single most insidious legislation adopted by Bahamian politicians. As the young kids say: "change my mind!"
As for the rest of his revisionist FNM history: I just don't have enough plungers to sift through that "stuff".
On COI video revises FNM history
Posted 11 February 2025, 3:29 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
I was going to reply to this bloviated nonsense, because I thought you had an understanding of financial services. However, after your first paragraph, it is clear that you have no understanding of either CESRA or the reason that it was adopted. And, based on your comments on this and other boards, you don't have the self-reflection to admit that you may be ignorant.
So, I'll let you merrily roll along.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 3:23 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
If you think tci, bvi, Cayman and - with a now Trump president - Delaware is a solution, you have absolutely no idea about financial services.
On Tax chief: Property filing target ‘ain’t so hard cut’
Posted 11 February 2025, 3:21 a.m. Suggest removal