The point left you a long time ago.

Bowe is stubbornly obnoxious with this issue. He, unsurprisingly, is proposing a solution that only works well for his bank's bottom line. There is no need for the government to "come together" with banks to create a REIT, which only benefits the bank. If Mr. Bowe, and his fellow banking executives, are serious about reducing the unproductive housing assets, as he calls them, then he can simply sell them at cost (no mark-up whatsoever). This is a true win-win: a) qualified buyers can purchase a viable home at a reduced cost (without destroying their debt ratio, thus allowing families more disposable income for other productive assets); and b) the bank converts stubborn unproductive assets into liquid cash, yes at 30 or 40 cents on the dollar. Bowe, for all his piety and wit, is just like most of us - wanting the government to bail him out of a situation.
This is not a difficult solution.

Strawman argument

This is a disgrace, of course. But the MP - who was also the MP when his party was in office - really should not attempt to clutch his pearls in this situation. He is every bit as culpable as anyone else that he chooses to blame.

Exactly, Don ANthony. Frankie's message, whatever you may think of him, is very sound.

Red herring, Strawman. The context of his quote is clear: investing in securities has the potential to yield greater returns than debt. Which is a universally accepted standard. I swear, ya'll niggas dumb as rocks.

I never confused you with having intelligence. Thank you for continually proving me accurate.

u wish. he will win easily

This dude can't even spell "FATF compliant" without a dictionary. Needs to be put out to retirement pasture.

Yawn. For all of Alicia's irreverent, embarrassing bluster, she does not even have the intelligence to offer any viable solutions. Nothing that she says here even meets the definition of a recommendation, and notice that she supports her nonsense with no empirical data at all. Sadly, however, Alicia, in all her hubris and faux wit, believes she is the bastion of intelligence and innovative logic. YAWN.
Look at the embarrassing suggestion two, where the hopeless Wallace suggests that the answer to our problems lies with showing a student where e=mcsquared applies to their future life. LOL. How the hell will a 9th grade student (an age where algebra is typically introduced) even know what applications their future self will use? I suggest the ignorant should familiarize herself with the work of Ralph Massey. Many of the nonsense proposed by Alicia is refuted, with data, by the esteemed scholar. (no, students don't need "real world application to do well on scores)>