Hubris at its finest. I assure you, Ms. Wallace, few, if any, want to see you in politics. You have nothing to offer the country that we havent seen 1,000 times before.
So, I am genuinely curious, DDK - not trying to be snarky at all. But, you are ok with people spending their last dollar on alcohol, but not numbers? Could you kindly explain the difference between the two, please?
Disagree, Bana10, this is "Jerry Falwell/Robert Jeffries/Pat Robertson" nonsense, masquerading as a form of spirituality - I intentionally did not use the word "Christianity". The moral argument either for, or against numbers houses has long since passed - like it or not, the PLP saw to that when they went against the wishes of the people. These so-called "pastors" are merely beating a dead horse that has long since been buried, prayed for and who's soul is with our ancestors.
Sheeprunner, Wayne will win this easily - it won't be that much of a "challenge". Actually, a novice attorney general counsel can win this case. You cannot discriminate against legal enterprises, period. This is very easy to understand.
Technically, they aren't crooks anymore, Sickened, regardless of how you may feel about them. What is being done is illegal - and Wayne has every right to defend his clients.
tetelestai says...
Hubris at its finest. I assure you, Ms. Wallace, few, if any, want to see you in politics. You have nothing to offer the country that we havent seen 1,000 times before.
On ALICIA WALLACE: Nothing personal, but sitting in the assembly is not the way to get the job done
Posted 20 May 2020, 6:39 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Doesnt matter, moncour, Wayne will win this case easily. Easy money for him.
On Web shops going legal on closure
Posted 20 May 2020, 11 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
So, you want to spend MORE money - to big fat cat millionare lawyers - in order to not pay working class Bahamians LESS money. Wow.
On Gaming Board appeals '24 redundant' verdict
Posted 18 May 2020, 6:08 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Fair enough. Thank you for the very mature rejoinder. Appreciate it!
On Webshops economic vampires
Posted 18 May 2020, 3:36 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
I will be succinct: "no".
On DIANE PHILLIPS: Is it time to bite the bullet and sell Bank of The Bahamas?
Posted 18 May 2020, 3:34 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
So, I am genuinely curious, DDK - not trying to be snarky at all. But, you are ok with people spending their last dollar on alcohol, but not numbers? Could you kindly explain the difference between the two, please?
On Webshops economic vampires
Posted 18 May 2020, 1:37 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Couldn't the two work "hand in hand"?
On EDITORIAL: Will the nation pass this test?
Posted 18 May 2020, 12:51 p.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Disagree, Bana10, this is "Jerry Falwell/Robert Jeffries/Pat Robertson" nonsense, masquerading as a form of spirituality - I intentionally did not use the word "Christianity". The moral argument either for, or against numbers houses has long since passed - like it or not, the PLP saw to that when they went against the wishes of the people. These so-called "pastors" are merely beating a dead horse that has long since been buried, prayed for and who's soul is with our ancestors.
On Webshops economic vampires
Posted 18 May 2020, 11:15 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Sheeprunner, Wayne will win this easily - it won't be that much of a "challenge". Actually, a novice attorney general counsel can win this case. You cannot discriminate against legal enterprises, period. This is very easy to understand.
On Webshops gearing up to challenge close order
Posted 18 May 2020, 10:38 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Technically, they aren't crooks anymore, Sickened, regardless of how you may feel about them. What is being done is illegal - and Wayne has every right to defend his clients.
On Webshops gearing up to challenge close order
Posted 18 May 2020, 10:36 a.m. Suggest removal