This is a dastardly letter written by Eric Carey, who ought to know better. If he, as a consultant, has a legitimate concern, then he ought to have privately lodged the same with DEPP, not write to the media in a pathetic attempt to either embarrass or indirectly apply pressure on Dr. Neely (who, by the way, is a country mile better at her job than the cowardly Carey was at his) and her team. Carey has long been considered a grandstander -- lurking for a political voice or acting as an environmentalist mouth for hire by any paying foreign investor -- not to be taken seriously by any truly objective environmentalist or scientist. Dr. Neely should ignore the splenetic Carey and continue to make the best decision for the country.
Respectfully, your article was dates April 25th. Mine was dated yesterday (28th). And it directly refuted both your and the 25th April assertions. The good news? Trump has already walked back his threats of escalating tariffs, as he should, as he was not in the pole position to advance such harsh measures, so it appears that the airliners will be able to restate their position within the next week or so.
That is not what they said. In fact, they said just the opposite: fares are becoming cheaper due to less bookings. They did, however, pull back their financial forecast. You can read it here: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/travel…
Again, it is a private placement, which, by definition, means that details do not have to be disclosed. That is not inherently corrupt, and it is certainly not illegal. But, as I mentioned in my first post, if the company is attempting a public offering (as suggested that prospectus is with the Securities Commission), then, perforce, the information will be disclosed. Let's wait and see before we start irresponsibly engaging in tabloid gossip.
Never one to let facts get in the way of a good story, are you? Our system does not work the way that Kimsley is describing (as he himself knows). Don't be ignorant, sheeprunner12, though I know that it is hard for you.
Idiot - that is not the way the system works. Please, by all means, be partisan - but have a damn understanding of the system before you talk nonsense on this website.
If, as the article says, the application is before the Securities Commission, then the complete prospectus has not been released to the general public as yet (Commission can't release it until it has been reviewed). So naturally, you will not see in the public domain, the information that you are suggesting. SC will not approve if that info is not in the prospectus. As for your questions regarding the 37% - it was acquired via private placement and, accordingly, legally the names of the owners behind that venture do not have to be disclosed to the public, hence the "private placement".
tetelestai says...
This is a dastardly letter written by Eric Carey, who ought to know better. If he, as a consultant, has a legitimate concern, then he ought to have privately lodged the same with DEPP, not write to the media in a pathetic attempt to either embarrass or indirectly apply pressure on Dr. Neely (who, by the way, is a country mile better at her job than the cowardly Carey was at his) and her team. Carey has long been considered a grandstander -- lurking for a political voice or acting as an environmentalist mouth for hire by any paying foreign investor -- not to be taken seriously by any truly objective environmentalist or scientist. Dr. Neely should ignore the splenetic Carey and continue to make the best decision for the country.
On Make right choice on Yntegra
Posted 6 May 2025, 3:23 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Brent, are you too lazy to find out the name of the 15 year old pitcher from Freedom Farm?
On Excitement builds over the senior baseball league
Posted 2 May 2025, 3:26 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Respectfully, your article was dates April 25th. Mine was dated yesterday (28th). And it directly refuted both your and the 25th April assertions.
The good news? Trump has already walked back his threats of escalating tariffs, as he should, as he was not in the pole position to advance such harsh measures, so it appears that the airliners will be able to restate their position within the next week or so.
On ‘Don’t panic’ but brace, hotel workers warned
Posted 29 April 2025, 9:25 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
That is not what they said. In fact, they said just the opposite: fares are becoming cheaper due to less bookings. They did, however, pull back their financial forecast. You can read it here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/travel…
On ‘Don’t panic’ but brace, hotel workers warned
Posted 29 April 2025, 3:41 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Again, it is a private placement, which, by definition, means that details do not have to be disclosed. That is not inherently corrupt, and it is certainly not illegal. But, as I mentioned in my first post, if the company is attempting a public offering (as suggested that prospectus is with the Securities Commission), then, perforce, the information will be disclosed. Let's wait and see before we start irresponsibly engaging in tabloid gossip.
On Bahamian investors in $20m power plant ownership offering
Posted 25 April 2025, 10:03 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Never one to let facts get in the way of a good story, are you? Our system does not work the way that Kimsley is describing (as he himself knows).
Don't be ignorant, sheeprunner12, though I know that it is hard for you.
On ‘Conflict of interest for Glover-Rolle to head Public Service and Labour’
Posted 25 April 2025, 5:42 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Idiot - that is not the way the system works. Please, by all means, be partisan - but have a damn understanding of the system before you talk nonsense on this website.
On ‘Conflict of interest for Glover-Rolle to head Public Service and Labour’
Posted 25 April 2025, 5:41 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
You support the FNM and make this nonsensical statement? LOL
On Glover-Rolle defends against union chief’s conflict of interest criticism
Posted 25 April 2025, 5:36 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
If, as the article says, the application is before the Securities Commission, then the complete prospectus has not been released to the general public as yet (Commission can't release it until it has been reviewed). So naturally, you will not see in the public domain, the information that you are suggesting. SC will not approve if that info is not in the prospectus. As for your questions regarding the 37% - it was acquired via private placement and, accordingly, legally the names of the owners behind that venture do not have to be disclosed to the public, hence the "private placement".
On Bahamian investors in $20m power plant ownership offering
Posted 25 April 2025, 5:15 a.m. Suggest removal
tetelestai says...
Yes of course, our financial troubles only began with this iteration of the government.
On PM: Tariffs put country in uncharted territory
Posted 11 April 2025, 3:22 a.m. Suggest removal