Projects were never meant to influence an election

EDITOR, The Tribune

I take exception to opinions proffered in the editorial appearing in the May 21, 2019 edition of The Tribune under the heading “Nothing lessens the purse strings like an election”.

The editorial writer sought to connect the New Providence Infrastructure Improvement Project (NPIIP) undertaken by my Government to a “classic moment of loosening the purse strings before an election”.

I attach for your information my Communication in the House of Assembly on 5 March, 2012 in which I addressed the 19-year history of the Project envisioned since 1994 when we engaged a Canadian firm, MM Dillon to prepare a transportation development plan for New Providence. This plan formed the basis of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) funded NPIIP (“the Project”).

The elaboration of the Project, which included the selection of a consulting firm, Mott MacDonald Consultants, a UK firm, for the development of the project and the sourcing of its funding from the IDB was a well thought out and planned programme of infrastructural improvements for our Capital Island.

The Project was conceived in response to an imperative to transform our aged and outdated public infrastructure, i.e. water mains and laterals, electric and communication conduits, poor drainage and congested road network in New Providence, an island whose population had more than doubled in the previous four decades. The Project broke ground in April, 2001.

The Charles Saunders Highway, Milo Butler Highway to Fire Trail Road and the realignment of Gladstone Road had been substantially completed and opened before the 2002 General Elections.

Subsequent to the 2002 General Election the company contracted to carry out the project, Associated Asphalt of the United Kingdom, went bankrupt due to circumstances unrelated to The Bahamas Project.

The Project was underpinned by Performance and Advance Payments Bonds. At that time, the Government chose not to enforce the Performance and Advance Payment Bonds which could have resulted in the project being completed by Interbetton, a Dutch company. Interbetton had been an acceptable bidder in the original bid process and was the contractor of the second Paradise Island Bridge. Had the Government enforced the Bonds the Project could have been completed in 2005.

Instead the first Christie Administration chose to continue only some aspects of the Project, including widening a section of Harrold Road and Blue Hill Road south between Harrold Road and Robinson Road and extending the Milo Butler Highway to Carmichael Road.

When the FNM was returned to office in 2007 my government immediately resumed our programme of infrastructure upgrades, including harbour deepening, water works, telecommunications and, of course, the completion of the Project.

Markedly roads in the city and other heavily populated areas were to be ungraded along with the underlying water and electrical and telecommunications infrastructure. That these works created nuisances and temporary inconveniences to businesses and the motoring public are acknowledged. I note the obvious, without the inner city infrastructural upgrades planned in the Project to include upgrade to distribution water mains and road drainage, improved road intersections, the installation of sidewalks and landscape, the long sought after renewal of the Over-the-Hill areas cannot happen.

It never occurred to me that any of these projects were meant to influence an election. Our initiatives were fulfillment of pledges and commitments dating from our first coming to office in August 1992; hence, my rejection of the editor’s conclusion that the work was undertaken for re-election purposes. Clearly your editorial writer did not let the facts get in the way of his uninformed opinion.

HUBERT INGRAHAM

Nassau

May 29, 2019

Comments

sheeprunner12 says...

Classic Hubiggity ................... He needs to write a letter apologizing to Bahamians for the misuse of the funds & resources in building that North Abaco seaport (that will never be used).

Posted 30 May 2019, 3:39 p.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

Come on FNM Papa we know better and it is my hope that you know better also
It is all about winning an election. As the election day draws nearer see how
much doc will love the poor. He will be in Bains Town cutting birthday cake.

Posted 30 May 2019, 3:42 p.m. Suggest removal

tetelestai says...

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

Posted 30 May 2019, 4:50 p.m.

realitycheck242 says...

The money spent on the NPIP was the best ting that ever happened for the roads in Nassau. Inspite of the inconveniences and business failures and cost over runs while the project was in progress the results were well worth it. The writer was accused of micro manageing every thing in his government but if micro management gets timely results for the government money, then that is what may be needed today. ..Nice historical perspective.of the NPIP

Posted 30 May 2019, 5:47 p.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

Ingraham's style was good for that time ......... Minnis is better suited for today. Until the Government commit to more FI development (like moving the capital to Fresh Creek, Andros) ......... this is the best road projects that can be done.

Posted 30 May 2019, 7:32 p.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

Fully agree. If anything the project cost him the election, and now we all benefit from the roads moving better.

Posted 31 May 2019, 9:18 a.m. Suggest removal

screwedbahamian says...

To have lost an election by the huge landslide in 2012 clearly states the Bahamian people were thoroughly dissatisfied with the Hubert " Papa Doc" Ingraham government and failed leadership.
CORRUPTION, POLITICAL CRONYISM and DICTATORSHIP ACTIONS were at the forefront of many of the reasons for the defeat.
The DICTATORIAL ACTION of retroactively amending the mandated NATIONAL INSURANCE PENSION SYSTEM and taking away the Retirement Pension Benefits of thousands of hard working Bahamians who contributed and their employers contributed to due the CORRUPTION, THIEF AND MISMANAGERMENT OF THE RETIREMENT FUNDS was with out a doubt one of the many reasons.
While he continue to live large, thousands of deserving old aged Bahamians are living in poverty. SHAME!!! SHAME!!! SHAME!!!

Posted 31 May 2019, 1:58 p.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

Ingraham and the FNM was nowhere near as BAD as the SLOP or Christie-led PLP (in terms of corruption, cronyism or victimization) ........... Minnis is not even as bad as Ingraham ................ Any objective person will agree with my opinion.

Posted 31 May 2019, 2:26 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment