PM’s meeting with Arawak Cay vendors ‘like a photo op’

BY LEANDRA ROLLE

Tribune Chief Reporter

lrolle@tribunemedia.net

A MEETING between Arawak Cay vendors affected by Sunday’s blaze and the prime minister was not favourable for business owners, the association’s president charged yesterday, describing the talks as “more like a photo op.”

“Nothing significant happened for the vendors,” Rodney Russell, president of the Arawak Cay Conch, Fish, Vegetable and Food Vendors Association, told The Tribune yesterday, referring to the outcome of Monday’s meeting with government officials. His stall, Red Snapper, was one of six structures that was completely destroyed in Sunday’s blaze. Two others were also damaged.

Mr Russell said while the government agreed to building several temporary structures within 60 days and outlined plans to vendor, no concrete long term plan was announced.

He claimed a “non-minister” offered an aerial view of the entire Arawak cay strip and suggested how vendors should rebuild.

However, Mr Russell argued that the government should instead ask business owners what support they need and focus on partnership rather than “dictatorship.”

“Persons sitting in government offices in air condition and having a view of what they perceive this place ought to be, should not be making decision for who builds this place,” he said.

His comments came after Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis posted photos of the roundtable meeting on social media, pledging his government’s commitment to supporting the vendors.

He had earlier said the tragedy underscores the need to upgrade the site and promised immediate cleanup and rebuild planning.

“I assured them that my government will stand with them. We will walk every step of this journey alongside vendors who helped make Fish Fry what it is today,” Mr Davis said.

Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper, speaking after the meeting, told ZNS it was too early to provide details, noting that no decisions have been made on how the government will assist. He added that those discussions will take place in the weeks ahead.

However, vendors who spoke to The Tribune said they were disappointed with the meeting’s outcome, saying no financial support was pledged.

“Nothing was promised,” Mr Russell said. “The way the meeting went, I think it was just a photo op for the Prime Minister to  say to the public that I have met with those persons involved, and we have looked at some possibilities of assisting them but there was no commitment made.”

Teshell Mackey, another affected owner, said she felt the government could have provided more information about its long term plans for vendors.

She said she appreciates the government’s plan to offer temporary assistance, but noted that questions remain about when vendors will be able to return to their permanent spots.

She estimated that rebuilding would cost at least $230,000 for her establishment, On the Edge.

“We need funds. We have employees. Our staff which we want keep so there’s a lot of things,” she said. “I’m more worried about them.”

She said the restaurant is her only source of income and expressed hope that vendors will receive some start-up assistance.

However, she said she cannot wait too long, as she has staff to support.

Comments

pt_90 says...

Yall went to the govt should have expected it to be honest.

We have people buildings not to code, a govt not enforcing code, others next door still not to code and potters cay not to code. No insurance, no fire supression, no requirement for fire suppression and here comes Travis and Sebas now talking about codes.

We are in a big mess.

Posted 19 November 2025, 11:30 a.m. Suggest removal

Sickened says...

What a crazy meeting. The vendors are begging for help but yet don't want any input from those they are begging from? The vendors are talking about how much it will cost to rebuild and that they have staff to take care of but why are they telling us that or the government? We don't need to know your troubles. Go talk to a bank like the rest of us do when we need money. You've been operating a business without paying for the land and probably not paying NIB for your staff. You have probably built out on WAY more land that was initially granted to you and now you're crying poor mouth.

If you can't afford to rebuild step aside and let someone else enjoy a free ride.

The MOST that government should do is clear all of the debris and then let those who can rebuild, rebuild. For the sake of the good lord above DO NOT build temporary shacks for these people in another area of Arawak Cay because they will NEVER EVER give up the new shack AND they will rebuild on the original land as well.

Posted 19 November 2025, 11:31 a.m. Suggest removal

joeblow says...

... Bahamians have lost the ability to grasp the concept of personal responsibility! It is not the governments job to "take care of you" or to provide relief outside of the existing structure that exists in Social Services. It is not the governments job to mitigate the risk you undertake in any business! But because they know an election is around the corner they want the taxpayers to bear the burden of rebuilding a (temporary) **personal** business that overcharges the public? To that I say, "no".

Posted 19 November 2025, 12:34 p.m. Suggest removal

hj says...

The sense of entitlement in this country. Probably no insurance company would insure these structures. You build on government land. You profit personally,and who knows if you pay any rent or business license. Yet I would be surprised if DIR ever sent anyone over there,armed or not,to check if you are compliant.And now you are basically demanding that taxpayers fund your business so you can keep profiting personally.

Posted 19 November 2025, 1:09 p.m. Suggest removal

TalRussell says...

Yes, As the political two main rivals in the political ring battled for power, the Yellah Party (YP) was elected, twice back in the 1960's as the party with responsibility and expectation to root out white man's dominated oligarchy of Bay Street Boys United Bahamian Party (UBP).-- That was before later becoming quasi joined at hips which might explain past  58 years back and forth between the two's sustaining switcharoo stabs @ governance' power. --- **Yes, "not be frivolous" but in all these 58 years and under the same two regimes, sat the UBP made Island. --- Which brungs us to reflect on today's 2025 Shantyisland's The Fish Fry. --- All of the above is 58 years of nothing better to showcase the poor planning that goes into our tourism products. Which is the truth!"

Posted 19 November 2025, 2 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment