Maybe the law should be changed to require the Unions to set aside retirement funds, say 25% out of the dues currently paid, for every member of the union.
That they should do this in equal increments of 8.33% each of the next three years.
The amount of money that the government has wasted in all these cases is amazing. I have heard that they are told that they can't win and then spend the time dragging it out which cost more money when they finally lose.
I guess they don't care as it is our money they are wasting.
When they lose we the people have to pay much of the winning sides costs.
They must have spent 0ne or two million on cases they caused by not following the law.
A government that does not follow the law must expect corruption and high crime by its citizens though as they have set the example.
Emmm.....the governments track record in the Courts on how government interprets the law has been on of total loss.....so I have my doubts about the Directors ability to interpret the law correctly.
Economist says...
Now all she has to do is make it available to the public. Just so we can be satisfied that, for once, there is nothing to hide.
On Deal to take country closer to collecting overflight fees
Posted 24 March 2017, 2:44 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
"the European Union suspended imports from **four** Brazilian meat-processing facilities."
So why are we banning "All"?
On Food store surprise at Brazil meat ban
Posted 22 March 2017, 4:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
Mr. "Rubis" "D average" Fitzgerald has a lot to answers for.
On Fitzgerald: Minnis must resign when Baha Mar opens
Posted 22 March 2017, 4:15 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
Maybe the law should be changed to require the Unions to set aside retirement funds, say 25% out of the dues currently paid, for every member of the union.
That they should do this in equal increments of 8.33% each of the next three years.
They would holler very loudly.
On Union leader supports government over changes to nation’s labour laws
Posted 22 March 2017, 2:55 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
You speak of "Honourable" persons. Guess not all deserve the title.
On Lightbourn: Govt refusing to answer questions about national issues
Posted 19 March 2017, 3:32 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
When you don't give answers it is clear that you have much to hide.
What you suspect is true or they would answer the question.
On Lightbourn: Govt refusing to answer questions about national issues
Posted 18 March 2017, 11:37 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
The amount of money that the government has wasted in all these cases is amazing. I have heard that they are told that they can't win and then spend the time dragging it out which cost more money when they finally lose.
I guess they don't care as it is our money they are wasting.
When they lose we the people have to pay much of the winning sides costs.
They must have spent 0ne or two million on cases they caused by not following the law.
A government that does not follow the law must expect corruption and high crime by its citizens though as they have set the example.
On Court rejects PM recusal appeal
Posted 17 March 2017, 5:24 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
He is absolutely correct.
This new law, as proposed is certain to create more unemployment and more crime and poverty.
On FNM deputy: Labour law reforms could ‘unbalance’ economy
Posted 17 March 2017, 4:21 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
Emmm.....the governments track record in the Courts on how government interprets the law has been on of total loss.....so I have my doubts about the Directors ability to interpret the law correctly.
On Labour chief dismisses ‘ultra vires’ concerns on law amendments
Posted 17 March 2017, 4:19 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
The Politicians hope that they will get re-elected by doing this. They don't care if the Country goes bankrupt, as long as they have been re-elected.
On Govt develops social benefits ‘we can’t afford’
Posted 15 March 2017, 4:28 p.m. Suggest removal