Head line to this article should have all of BPL's customers wondering exactly which bill is Bannister really talking about. Is he talking about our already sky high monthly electricity bill or is he talking about the new legislative bill that will increase our already sky high monthly electricity bill through the roof, especially during the summer months?

The Tribune owners are more interested in their online advertising revenue from such articles about the alleged disgusting and deviant behaviour of those charged with sex crimes.

You can bet the court room in this case is packed with those who have nothing better to do than be entertained by hearing salacious smut.

And of course The Tribune knows there are many sick souls in our society who love nothing more than to hear or read explicit material centred around alleged sexually abuse.

Amen!

You mean you need him. The rest of us would rather have anyone but him, and for good reason.

The very cruel, evil and nasty Minnis was the most senselessly power crazed and tyrannically authoritarian PM our country has ever had. God forbid the people of our nation ever again have another monstrously wicked and demonic PM like him.

Mitchell belongs in Haiti.

Something seems terribly amiss with these unexpected financial results given the deepening economic malaise of the domestic economy over the past year or so and CB's unusually high exposure to investments in short duration debt securities issued or guaranteed by the government.

Too big to fail only works for a short while as it assumes the government would be willing and able to continue debasing the Bahamian dollar by increasing the local money supply and driving domestic inflation through the roof.

I suspect PM Davis has been told by several prominent Bahamian KCs that dumbo AG Pinder is in way over his head and that the handful of our country's more competent KCs probably all have real or potential conflicts of interest in representing government, recognising that its mega million dollar claim against the GBPA is based in large part on the report PWC was commissioned to prepare.

You flatter yourself. I suspect many of us don't even try to decipher your convoluted posts aimed at trying to entertain rather than enlighten. But it's certainly your right and privilege to mumbo-jumbo away as you usually do on this website.

The legal team representing the GBPA will no doubt be looking into any possible harmful role the PWC accountants may have played in this matter to the extent their report may in some way be materially biased or factually incorrect for whatever reason.