A lot of the property tax allegedly owed is due to the Department of Inland Revenue not having accurate or up-to-date records. Some properties have been sold and even though they are registered under contract he new owners, they are still recorded under the original ow. And even though the previous owners would have paid off all outstanding taxes when they sold the property, new taxes are still being generated for them after the sale has taken place.

The problem in this country is most men in power panders to women under the guise or pretex of ‘looking out for the women.’ Of course, many get favors from these ( male) politicians which often includes sex and even secret fatherhood. And, of course, some of these women are married and the husband is clueless as to what is going on. He is actually taking care of children that is not paternally his, but since the law says ‘the husband is presumed to be the father of and child born within a marriage, he is still legally responsible.’ Then how is this connected to spouses who are in a marriage and do not want to submit? In fact they now want the legal power to bring rape charges on any spouse that attempts to enforce the benefits of their marriage. So this leaves the offended spouse the easier option to opt out of the marriage before it gets even to accusations of rape. So does this mean the divorce rate will increase? Or does it mean that the amount of (mostly women) wanting and willing to bring rape charges is so infantissimaly small it will not make a difference. But what will change is the spouse who will now be able to say ‘if you touch me one more time, I will holler R A P E!’

Samson and Delilah

Ever wonder why certain businesses flourish when all others struggle to keep their door open? Ever wondered why increases in import duties and taxes doesn't faze some people? A former MP said that is how we corner the market. We go to the house and raise taxes but we already have mechanisms in place to avoid paying those taxes. So while the other fella is out there struggling, we can undercut his prices and still make more prpofit tthan him, And there will always be someone willing to work in the channel. Hey its a part of doing business.

Can messenger Alicia Wallace et. al. Answer one simple question: if you don’t like seafood w, why go to a seafood bar and demand they change their menu? If you don’t agree with the terms and conditions of Holy Matrimony, why enter into is then demand the laws be change only to include what you agree with? If you take away all the privileges of marriage then what is the difference from married parties behaving as if they were single?

Well I agree with you 100% baclarke. Firstly Why enter a marriage if you do not intend to fulfill the wows? Secondly, Wayne Munroe says under current laws, if a partner withholds sex for no apparent reason or for an unreasonable period of time, this is ‘cruel and unusual punishment.’ And for the marital rape law to come into effect, adultry must no longer be grounds for divorce since if a partner is being treated unusually cruel in a marriage he/she had a right to seek redress. Most men know of and have learned to sleep in the doghouse. But this is not the issue here . The problem is with women who never intended to submit. And to some extent with men who entered into a marriage knowing they could not perform their marital duties with a female.

Paul says God allows for divorce because of the hardening of man’s hearts. (species, not gender). So if either or both partners no longer wants to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of a marriage, God offers them a way out. And this option was offered Two Thousand years ago! Why you now want to criminalize and send your spouse to jail when the fault or desire not to submit is in you?

Rather than continue to hurl insults, be mature and address the issue of marital rape and say, in plain language what I have posted that offends you. You said the Bible was written 2,000 years ago but the sanctity of marriage is still the same. If a spouse enters a marriage not intending to fulfill his/her marriage wows then they are infidels, fraudsters and deceivers. Not worthy of being a partner to holy matrimony. If one partner has to use force to get the other partner to submit, that marriage was already over tge rocks.

I se you are still using your second pseudonym to compliment and sanction anything you post. So if a woman can do anything a man can do let one, choose one, get me impregnated. Likewise let one find a male who can carry a child for nine months then give birth. Men and women are equal, yes, but their roles are different. And if you is one who has to strap on a piece of rubber to prove otherwise, or support some who do, then your argument is false. Made of plastic. Has always been artificial . And yes those perverted people also have rights and protection under the law. But it doesn’t include the right to tamper with the sanctity of marriage.

The remarks I made about your mother and her mother still stands. You may consider them disparaging but they are truth!