"For example a male wearing makeup and a female cutting her hair short and acting and dressing in a manner that a heterosexual male would." That is not all, this transgender issue is also serious. What they are pushing for is for these same females who cut their hair short to be able to go in a male bathroom and get involved in dominantly male lifestyles when their natural makeup dictate otherwise. A man wearing makeup wants to be seen and known as a woman, and would like all the benefits of a woman despite their natural makeup dictating otherwise. Does this mean that they will start putting 'men' who think they are women in women prisons and vice versa? the detrimental effect on natural lifestyle goes on and on, which would then lead humans to think, what is really natural? We still cant find cures for diseases etc but yet we claim to have the answer to this LGBT issue? Its a lot more than two persons just wanting to seek a relationship, I mean they can do this already nobody cares. The thing is they want to change everybody elses lifestyle because of their own insecurities.

So why hire a surrogate? What is the real meaning of family when the child doesn't know who his/her real father or mother is? That child will sitll want to know. Just like children who act out because of a missing father or mother. And you said "Just as heterosexual couples go to fertility doctors"? They go to fertility doctors to help them conceive a child that they both possible make together. The natural process of conceiving is now going to be a business for fathers that want a surrogate to bare children to have them sold to them (its costs). Women will now be seen as 'carriers' rather than mothers, this idea can even dive into a new black market. So you see nothing wrong with what you posted and how it could be a slap in the face to creation?

the problem with Bahamians is, they believe America and their lifestyles are to be compared with ours. America is not the answer to everything, regardless of how they handle 'their' problems/issues.

hate crime seriously? like that exists here. Most of the crimes here with homosexuals are between homosexuals.

This is not in my mind, these are tried and studied. I used examples of scenarios. Not to be biased against women but each man and woman play a special role in the make up of a family. You picking out adoption being vain is nothing what I describe, I talked about the used and rise in artificial insemination for two spouses that cannot naturally have children together, these institutions were created for male and females relationships that could not bare forth children. Now the homosexual will see this as an option to have children where they can pick how they look, blue eyes, blonde hair example which is in my idea an abuse and slap in the face for why this technology was 'humanely' brought forth. Who said anything about children cannot be raised by single mothers? Marriage is for persons that eventually want to start some kind of family, however most persons in a relationship dont realize that they cant have children until after marriage, thats why adoption can be a option. (not talking about relationships that have children out of wedlock) In regard to your 5th question: Is that what you gathered? because you lack understanding. The point was that when Children get into this niche in Lesbian/Gay couples that they have two mothers/fathers, the idea that a mother and father should come together will surely removed and that child will think maybe families naturally do not need to consist of Mother and Father and their idea based on a two woman/man relationship will be 'learnt' rather than 'natural' because homosexuals do claim their ways to be natural when really and truly I believe it to be lust and sexual desire. Also, these types of relationships would give Fathers that dont want to take care of their kids more of an excuse not to, because lesbians will create the idea or culture that fathers are not needed in a relationship/family. I said homosexuals will cause a 'RISE' in HIV/AIDs transmission because of their scandalous, promiscuous habits in these unstable types of relationships. What the hell are you talking about the 1950's, thanks for being a smart ass and not accurately dissecting my post, asking questions about it that were already answered. You could dislike me but if your gonna read and reply to a comment, try to understand what a person is saying rather than being an imbecile about it.

Nobody needs an education lesson. There is nothing to be educated about except for the worldwide repercussions that this LGBT 'idea' will have on the way of life and ultimately humanity.

For many of the uninformed here is 'some' of information regarding how homosexuality and the legalization of its marriage and worldwide acceptance will ultimately affect the world, humanity and its longevity:
No procreation, Same-sex "marriage" would further isolate marriage from its procreative purpose or the ability to multiply the earth and push forth humanity. The adoption of 'artificial' insemination and the 'scientific' harvest of human reproductive organisms for vane reasons. Children will then hunger for their real biological parents. Children need both Fathers and Mothers not Adam and Steve or Susan and Anne. Evidence suggests children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Most homosexuals tend to be with multiple partners and they eliminate the domestication of men by women. Marriages thrive more when spouses specialize in gender-typical roles etc. Same-sex "marriage" would further diminish the expectation of paternal commitment for ex: Same-sex civil marriage would institutionalize the idea that children do not need both their mother and their father and they could tell themselves, our society, which would now affirm lesbian couples raising children, to believe that children do not need a father. So, they might tell themselves, I do not need to marry or stay married to the mother of my children.. Last but not least, there will also be a new rise in the spread of HIV/AIDs because of the scandalous and promiscuous habits created in these types of unstable relationships. These are some of the detriments, yet you worry about yourselves and not about the overall impact on the world, humanity and its nature of living and coexistence. That is why your arguments are fallacious, because they are biased and they do not encompass the overall effect of the outcome.

No procreation, Same-sex "marriage" would further isolate marriage from its procreative purpose or the ability to multiply the earth and push forth humanity. The adoption of 'aritificial' insemination and the scientific harvest of human reproductive organisms. Children will then hunger for their real biological parents. Children need both Fathers and Mothers not Adam and Steve or Susan and Anne. Evidence suggests children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Most homosexuals tend to be with multiple partners and they eliminate the domestication of men by women. Marriages thrive more when spouses specialize in gender-typical roles etc. Same-sex "marriage" would further diminish the expectation of paternal commitment for ex: Same-sex civil marriage would institutionalize the idea that children do not need both their mother and their father and they could tell themselves, our society, which would now affirm lesbian couples raising children, to believes that children do not need a father. So, they might tell themselves, I do not need to marry or stay married to the mother of my children.. These are some of the detriments, yet you worry about yourselves and not about the overall impact on the world, humanity and its nature of living and coexistence. That is why your arguments are fallacious, because they are biased and does not encompass the overall effect of the outcome.

Obama has not put anything anywhere. Only a couple states allowed homosexual marriage. This aint America. If I say 'you homos' the homosexual should be proud because I am acknowledging their classification. What do you mean Bahamians havent had the experience of being left out? Their are many unemployed and underpaid here, and many other experiences of being left out for Bahamians, dont let the many smiles fool you and the government to persuade you otherwise. Your understanding of principle is mistaken, did you not see the reason I provided.Technically, everyone is not doomed to hell because of the forgiveness aspect. Life is based on a choice, and every choice has a consequence, whether it will be seen now or later. It still does not defeat the fact that your argument is not enough to support your cause.

they dont see the true detriment of this ordeal only what their insecurities provide such as arrogance, jealousy, lust, hatred, and sacrilege to the obvious truth. Their argument behind this is in fact fallacious and not enough to support their issue.