For many of the uninformed here is 'some' of information regarding how homosexuality and the legalization of its marriage and worldwide acceptance will ultimately affect the world, humanity and its longevity:
No procreation, Same-sex "marriage" would further isolate marriage from its procreative purpose or the ability to multiply the earth and push forth humanity. The adoption of 'artificial' insemination and the 'scientific' harvest of human reproductive organisms for vane reasons. Children will then hunger for their real biological parents. Children need both Fathers and Mothers not Adam and Steve or Susan and Anne. Evidence suggests children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Most homosexuals tend to be with multiple partners and they eliminate the domestication of men by women. Marriages thrive more when spouses specialize in gender-typical roles etc. Same-sex "marriage" would further diminish the expectation of paternal commitment for ex: Same-sex civil marriage would institutionalize the idea that children do not need both their mother and their father and they could tell themselves, our society, which would now affirm lesbian couples raising children, to believe that children do not need a father. So, they might tell themselves, I do not need to marry or stay married to the mother of my children.. Last but not least, there will also be a new rise in the spread of HIV/AIDs because of the scandalous and promiscuous habits created in these types of unstable relationships. These are some of the detriments, yet you worry about yourselves and not about the overall impact on the world, humanity and its nature of living and coexistence. That is why your arguments are fallacious, because they are biased and they do not encompass the overall effect of the outcome.

No procreation, Same-sex "marriage" would further isolate marriage from its procreative purpose or the ability to multiply the earth and push forth humanity. The adoption of 'aritificial' insemination and the scientific harvest of human reproductive organisms. Children will then hunger for their real biological parents. Children need both Fathers and Mothers not Adam and Steve or Susan and Anne. Evidence suggests children raised by homosexuals are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Most homosexuals tend to be with multiple partners and they eliminate the domestication of men by women. Marriages thrive more when spouses specialize in gender-typical roles etc. Same-sex "marriage" would further diminish the expectation of paternal commitment for ex: Same-sex civil marriage would institutionalize the idea that children do not need both their mother and their father and they could tell themselves, our society, which would now affirm lesbian couples raising children, to believes that children do not need a father. So, they might tell themselves, I do not need to marry or stay married to the mother of my children.. These are some of the detriments, yet you worry about yourselves and not about the overall impact on the world, humanity and its nature of living and coexistence. That is why your arguments are fallacious, because they are biased and does not encompass the overall effect of the outcome.

Obama has not put anything anywhere. Only a couple states allowed homosexual marriage. This aint America. If I say 'you homos' the homosexual should be proud because I am acknowledging their classification. What do you mean Bahamians havent had the experience of being left out? Their are many unemployed and underpaid here, and many other experiences of being left out for Bahamians, dont let the many smiles fool you and the government to persuade you otherwise. Your understanding of principle is mistaken, did you not see the reason I provided.Technically, everyone is not doomed to hell because of the forgiveness aspect. Life is based on a choice, and every choice has a consequence, whether it will be seen now or later. It still does not defeat the fact that your argument is not enough to support your cause.

they dont see the true detriment of this ordeal only what their insecurities provide such as arrogance, jealousy, lust, hatred, and sacrilege to the obvious truth. Their argument behind this is in fact fallacious and not enough to support their issue.

How is it unproven? Homosexuality for example was one of the main reasons for the spread of the deadly 'HIV/AIDs' virus and its migration to the western hemisphere. HIV/AIDs became dominant and rampant because of homosexual relationships. Thats one issue out of many

So what is the all of a sudden 'focus' on homosexuality, if they have been around for years and years, why now is this an issue? If persons want to indulge, they can in their own privacy. No need to force it into the modern way of life, you think that if humanity naturally wanted to adopt it, that this would be a major issue? Why dont they harass and crack down on the countries that are actually persecuting persons with death etc. Religion and in fact Christianity does not force persons to do anything, they are simply guidelines to life. You choose to live the life in whatever way you want. The issues you have with homosexuality in terms of freedom, does not outweigh the natural disadvantages of it in regard to the majority of persons that inhabit the earth. You homo's are free, what exactly is your issue..? The fact that you cant walk into a woman's bathroom or be known as a woman when your physical orientation dictates otherwise and vice versa? Christ did not come to change the Old Testament laws but to supersede them for living after his sacrifice, the principles behind those rules still remain unchanged.

Should not, thats why I said 'If' PGC doesnt do a lot of things that he as leader is supposed to do.

You talk as if they are these persons as spat at, segregated, and not allowed to be free almost like the once treatment of blacks and civil rights movement. These persons are free to do what ever they want, what you mean we dont accept them ''as people, as we would any other citizen, resident or visitor?''. Every single one of them can do what they left their houses/hotels to do. How will we ever get where? Freddy is pushing an evident 'personal' issue, not on behalf of all, but he is seeking the accolade of having something 'internationally' recognized on behalf on the Bahamas besides the frequent travelling. If PGC tends to ""'caves to the cries to fire Minister Freddy.." then it would not be a 'weak' move but he would be known for actually doing something

Well in the LGBT's case, its not apart of the law, and this implication has a greater effect than the 'discrimination' argument that they are trying to push. This does not only change the law but the way of life, and ultimately creation as we know it.

@TalRussell, your realistic 'natural' view will always be limited based on the average leaps of the human mind. You are simply implying that people use various scriptures to support their argument is not the lesson Proverbs 26:17 tried to convey. Many translations tend to give the wrong impression, I would suggest sticking with the KJV or NKJV. The Proverb is simply telling you to be prepared for the issue that would arise if you were to jump into somebody's argument. In this case, its the LGBT vs The Bahamas, and this is not somebody's business, but it also being an article released to the public; I think there is enough reason to suggest that this issue is everybody's business. It affects us all, and this issue is not important for the Country right now and it is a very, minimal issue as you can see from @Jessemo's above comment.