Yes he did. He made the same promise to others as well.

> Note he wants everyone to come together as one but on his terms. that he is Leader.

Exactly. His idea of unity is "do what I say and worship me or else you are out of here." He has refused to accept that he must take the lead in fostering unity. The man is intoxicated with his delusions and his lust for what he is clearly not fit to have. He and Christie are clearly drunk off the same batch.

Maurice Moore is singing for the supper Minnis has promised him - the same plate of supper Minnis has promised to several other people by the way, but who's counting among people who clearly do not have the sense God gave a mule

"Hell" is where Maurice Moore needs to go to, or where he came from; take your pick.

I agree with you about a transition. The thing with FNMs is, it seems that even that would not have been okay with them. The transition would either be too long or too short, or either would include too much or too little of what personally pleases them.

So it's pretty safe to say Rollins won't be running in Fort Charlotte, if anywhere at all?

You keep calling Minnis PLP Lite. He has long since graduated to full fledged PLP status.

Small wonder FNMs are in such a bad state; their mindset says it all. The Members of Parliament chose Minnis as their Leader of Opposition, who was then appointed by the GG. That is how the Leader of Opposition is appointed in this country. Remember? One person in Parliament, no matter who it is, cannot appoint the Leader of Opposition. And your party's delegates elected Minnis by acclimation at your 2012 special session. Remember? FNMs are shameless in the way they constantly try to re-write their party's history. Say what you want about PLPs, but they don't try to demonize their former leader though he is worthy of condemnation for his acts. FNMs on the other hand are shamelessly ungrateful against the only leader that has taken them to victory, repeatedly so, and who did not lead them into any disrepute during that time. Minnis is Minnis' fault. Lay the man's blame at his feet where it belongs. And the FNM as a whole is at fault for allowing Minnis to take the party to this level. The FNM should have reigned Minnis in long ago, but refused to do so. Don't you know your own party's Constitution? You guys had the power to stop Minnis from going this far. You guys allowed this mess to continue for this long and now we the voters are stuck with dumb, dumber and DNA.

What did the FNM do in a former life to deserve this? This party is in shambles, and their "leader" is shelling out all this cash to say "look how wonderful I am". He is sick, and so is everyone clinging onto him on the sinking ship that is the FNM today. Minnis and Christie are mirror images of each other.

FNMs are funny. So who is the reason for the FNMs successes? Let me guess - everyone else with Ingraham simply playing a role, right? When your party is defeated, you are supposed to resign. That is an automatic. If your party wishes you to stay on they can ask you to do so, but you are supposed to offer your resignation immediately and unreservedly. Tommy Turnquest offered his resignation in 2002 after their party lost. The party asked him to stay on, and he ultimately did.