This person needs to stay in the church with his finger on his lips. The lack of knowledge in his commentary is embarrassing, and what is more embarrassing is that the Tribune did not balance his comments with the correct information about the Constitution and how it can be changed, etc.

No category, under the Constitution.

> Mr Smith told The Tribune the proper place for the determination of the extent of parliamentary privilege is in the Supreme Court, not in in the House of Assembly.

This is absolutely incorrect. Whether Smith knows that or not probably would depend on which headline he is seeking to grab in any given news week.

The Act gives one until March if he or she requests an extension of time ahead of the December deadline.

Does the public really need to be asked what should be done when a law is not followed? Appropriately amend the Act to give it actual teeth and then do what The Bahamas seems morbidly averse to - enforce the law on the books without fear or favor.

LOL. Somebody please...

Hare Krishna! Somebody make it stop!

Ah mi Dios! And some are pushing against it in an attempt to hide their homosexual identity **Moss**. Goodness the dishonesty in this country is putrefying.

The contract with Renew was never tabled, and instead of the Opposition chasing windmills regarding who signed a supposed Letter of Intent that also has never been seen, it should have hammered into the matter of the contract through the most powerful Committee of Parliament which during this Session is chaired by the Opposition. But that of course would mean the Opposition actually knows what to do and how to do and actually has the political will to do it. Moving on...

Funny how people keep claiming God doesn't like ugly while at the same time continuing to claim that He keeps making it. After all these eons, I'd think that if He really didn't like it, He's stop making what He doesn't like!