He only told us that procedures need to be put in place if someone doesn't sign in. Surely these procedures are already in place? And Mr. Munroe doesn't seem to know if there are procedures or what they may be, if there are any. His comment about why have them sign in if they are being monitored is also very ignorant. There are several reasons why a person should show themselves in person and one of them should be to ensure that the bracelet has not been tampered with AND to recharge it at the station.
First off, more that one person should get the reports about someone not signing in. That way you can't just bribe one person to look the other way.
Second, Reid states that they could have found him in a heartbeat. That would only be true if the person on bail chooses to recharge his ankle bracelet, and obviously a fella who doesn't sign in is NOT recharging his own tracking device. DUH!!!
Thirdly, putting a criminal in charge of locking his own cell behind him (i.e. recharging an ankle bracelet) is stupid. The process should be that a person being monitored must recharge his ankle bracelet as part of the process of signing in. If the bracelet looses power in less than a week, then the person must sign in more than once a week. SIMPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No reporting on the company that owns the truck or who the driver is? But yet they know the brakes failed? So they must have interviewed the driver to know the brakes failed but did not ask him his name or who he works for? Strange reporting.
Imagine if 8 of those passengers survived the crash but with serious injuries. I don't think any of them would have remained alive by the time they reached a major hospital.
We just aren't equipped for a small but major accident.
Sickened says...
He only told us that procedures need to be put in place if someone doesn't sign in. Surely these procedures are already in place?
And Mr. Munroe doesn't seem to know if there are procedures or what they may be, if there are any. His comment about why have them sign in if they are being monitored is also very ignorant. There are several reasons why a person should show themselves in person and one of them should be to ensure that the bracelet has not been tampered with AND to recharge it at the station.
On Crime consultant says "somebody dropped the ball" in witness murder
Posted 22 July 2026, 11:52 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
First off, more that one person should get the reports about someone not signing in. That way you can't just bribe one person to look the other way.
Second, Reid states that they could have found him in a heartbeat. That would only be true if the person on bail chooses to recharge his ankle bracelet, and obviously a fella who doesn't sign in is NOT recharging his own tracking device. DUH!!!
Thirdly, putting a criminal in charge of locking his own cell behind him (i.e. recharging an ankle bracelet) is stupid. The process should be that a person being monitored must recharge his ankle bracelet as part of the process of signing in. If the bracelet looses power in less than a week, then the person must sign in more than once a week. SIMPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Crime consultant says "somebody dropped the ball" in witness murder
Posted 22 July 2026, 8:37 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Wow!!! This is great news. Kudos to the department.
On Labour Crackdown
Posted 21 July 2026, 2:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Arawak Cay and Potter's Cay are littered with wrecks. Why aren't the captains and business people in the area insisting on getting them removed??
On Wreck removal failure causing ‘real nuisance’
Posted 21 July 2026, 8:40 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Bingo!
On Court of Appeal denies appeal for reduced sentence due to illness
Posted 21 July 2026, 8:36 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
So people with serious health problems CAN get a pass from going to prison? That just sounds to easy.
On Court of Appeal denies appeal for reduced sentence due to illness
Posted 20 July 2026, 9:07 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
No reporting on the company that owns the truck or who the driver is? But yet they know the brakes failed? So they must have interviewed the driver to know the brakes failed but did not ask him his name or who he works for? Strange reporting.
On Truck ploughs through cars on Sir Sidney Poitier Bridge
Posted 20 July 2026, 9:04 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
I just got power back... so now I can comment.
BPL and our government is slack and crap!!
On Residents sleep in cars as outages plague Golden Gates
Posted 17 July 2026, 9:55 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Imagine if 8 of those passengers survived the crash but with serious injuries. I don't think any of them would have remained alive by the time they reached a major hospital.
We just aren't equipped for a small but major accident.
On Aviation reps challenge claims on Andros crash response
Posted 17 July 2026, 9:53 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Exactly! He should say it. The judge should say it. Our politicians should say it. Our police farce should say it.
On ‘Substantial danger to the community’
Posted 26 June 2026, 1:27 p.m. Suggest removal