The people who need to be concerned here are the people who gave hundreds of thousands, iv not millions to ArawakX as investors **in ArawakX**. They are a different type of investor. They're not interested in 1000 dollar share offerings. They typically have the highest classification of shares and they invest large amounts individually. They're typically well versed about investing, and understand that returns come over the long term, years. The people calling up the gas company with worry likely invested 500 dollars.

I do not know what the "specific" processes around ArawakX' platform are, but in general if you invest in a company you should have "something" to signify what ownership you have. If you invested in Tropical Gyros your "something" will say "Tropical Gyros" **not** "ArawakX."

For want of a better example ArawakX is like MrShipIt. If you want a product from Amazon, MrShipIt provides you with a platform to order then have that product transferred to you. You pay MrShipIt a fee for their service, your business/product transaction is with Amazon, if you have a problem with a defective product you contact Amazon (or the original seller)not Mr ShipIt.

All MrShipIt and ArawakX do is provide the environment for a transaction between buyer and seller to happen and then complete

"*“I am now getting concerned messages from people saying they invested and want an update on the Arawak X debacle. I have no idea what to tell them,”*

My point again about investor ignorance. ArawakX has nothing to do with the operation of businesses they raised monies for. These people should sinply not be investing. The only people who should have any concern are the **millionaires** who invested in ArawakX itself. Even one of the companies that raised funds appears to be lost saying they raised 160k but ArawakX "*took out fees*". Did they read the contract? The service couldnt be free.

Again, very striking that this all went down over the exact same period as FTX and collapsing at the exact same time , both companies appearing to have received alot of excitement from the regulator but quality/existence of oversight is now a question for the US courts

So I dont know if your comment will be deleted or not but generally how does that work? When a foreign client brings money for a land transaction does the attorney have to investigate the source of funds(assuming so). And if source of funds was "FTX" would the attorney be obligated to dig deeper?

Smart, so only your 5year old great grand daughter could tell the tale! Your press secretary dont have no notes about the Barbie discussion.

Do you ever take meeting by phone or video chat?

Why does the crowd funding saga sound exactly like FTX? Not the details of the case just that the alleged breaches happened with the SEC seemingly none the wiser. Check the dates. The activity around both companies happened at the same time, starting sometime in 2021 and ending in October 2022. The exact same period of non-oversight.

"*Nassau needs a properly structured statutory authority to govern its affairs. The central Government controlling the area is not working.*"

Does anybody in their right mind believe Dr Minnis will hand control over to anybody

Seriously? What happened to the Ragged Islsnd green island that he announced on 60mins?

They started sneaking up prices months ago. Literally 2 days after opec said theyd reduce oil production Bastian himself said he knew a retailer who5d already increased prices. Based on what? No shipment at an increased price could have possibly have arrived in 2 days