Comment history

ThisIsOurs says...

Passing Bills is their job. The fact that they have a super majority makes passing a bill even less significant. What else?

ThisIsOurs says...

Repost:

*Can a person off the street convicted of a crime run for office? Even if they served less than a year? No, the constitution forbids it. Then what makes that convicted criminal less desirable than someone convicted of a crime while in office? Fact, nobody creates a rule to disadvantage themself*

ThisIsOurs says...

Can a person off the street convicted of a crime run for office? Even if they served less than a year? No, the constitution forbids it. Then what makes that convicted criminal less desirable than someone convicted of a crime while in office? Fact, nobody creates a rule to disadvantage themself

ThisIsOurs says...

I have too much to say... I cant remember what was so inflammatory that it had to be censored

ThisIsOurs says...

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

On Police Commissioner announces prorogation of Parliament

Posted 13 August 2023, 5:43 a.m.

ThisIsOurs says...

The IMF can discuss anything as theyve done for years, and they will serve their best interest. It does not mean we have to accept their plan. Barbados rejected their plan, it was a rough road for the citizens but nevertheless the plan to devalue the dollar was rejected.

ThisIsOurs says...

Oh so you mean he's a false prophet ...

ThisIsOurs says...

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

On Police Commissioner announces prorogation of Parliament

Posted 12 August 2023, 3:06 p.m.

ThisIsOurs says...

I believe what he's saying is because of the network speed streaming quality has improved so instead of using low data services like reading articles you may watch more movies. 10mins watching a movie would eat up more data than 10 mins reading news articles

ThisIsOurs says...

"*A portion of the roof that was under construction collapsed,“ Mr Smith said. “But the roof did not collapse because you don’t have a roof until it’s completed, so that portion collapsed.*"

**Is Mr Smith serious? The gold standard of construction is "*if the building falls down but it's not yet complete that doesnt mean anything*"? This should never happen**, not only is it a loss of thousands in materials, labour and time (please tell us how much for all 3) , it is a clear and present danger to workers both construction and otherwise. **This also calls into question every piece of work the "contractor" completed. The files should be pulled and a qualified inspector independent of MOW should immediately review all of his work**. If less than this is done, the minister should be held personally liable should any part of a completed structure anywhere collapse and injure someone.

**What were the inspection points on this work? Please ask a contractor about this**