Mr Roberts wants to talk health?……
How does a profiteer who markets cheap food at extortionate prices, that cause the biggest health burden in the nation through obesity, mal-absorption, heart disease, high blood-pressure, and pesticide and additive poisoning, get to think he can talk health? rol!

And the people are going to listen to another greedy oligarch who clearly has not researched fact-based unbiased sources! ?

Vaccine vs non-vaccine don’t appear to have much between them…BOTH parties need to wear a mask and follow public health protocols, both parties can catch sars cov2, both parties can carry it to others, both parties can get very sick with it, and be hospitalized. What are the differences? One group want their hedonist freedoms at any cost, the other were respectfully following the protocols and watching the science. One group might not get as sick with COVID, but science is starting to suggest they will be very sick in the future. The other group, mostly the unhealthy, will risk getting very sick and taking proven medications or die, while the other majority of the group will have avoided chronic complications for which there is no support or legal recourse.

Until the trials for these companies have reached their conclusion we are left with the unfolding evidence…and the law, ethics, and human rights. Ignorant people follow fear and the “popular” “agenda”. Is there an agenda? At the start of this I thought not and I followed the science. For months now those so called “theorists” seem to have been the prophets. It would now appear that a tide is rising towards the abolition of law, ethics, and human rights until a new law, new “ethics” and the complete destruction of human rights has been achieved.

Stamford university did an interesting study on what makes a loser in life. They watched children who were either marshmallow eaters because they had no patience to let time unfold, or those who had the patience to resist one tasty marshmallow for a much better outcome in the future. Guess who the adult losers were!? Not those who watched, waited, and got the facts before they impulsively served their wants.

I suggest Mr. Roberts is looking at his current profits and thinking the media are telling him the current scientific facts. He appears to be a bully who wants to brutally enforce his own opinion. Do such people really get a soap box of power in this country; is the true notion of democracy a myth?

Dear Felicity Darville, I wish to humbly make a clarification to your article. In your first paragraph you state that, “The remainder includes various Christian and non-Christian religions like Greek Orthodox, Rastafari….”. What is today called World Orthodoxy (aka New Calendar) can no longer claim to be Christian, in the true sense of the word. That is another several paragraphs on history I shall not relate here, suffice to say that the Holy Bible says there is and ever will be, “One, Lord, one Faith, one Baptism.” and not many, as the Branch Theory of Ecumenism would have us believe. The historic fact is that, unlike the The Holy Qubtic Church of The Black Messiah which is 11-years-old, and many of the denominations you mentioned with their own post-Christian dates of creation, Orthodoxy is over 2000 years old. Even the Rastafarian religion has its roots in the original Apostolic mission of Christ’s Church to Ethiopia. Perhaps a better gauge of what can be considered Christian is not in its cultural relevance and its modernity but to its antiquity, its Apostolicity, and its authenticity. St Vincent asked of those calling themselves Christian…was what they are teaching taught by the Church to all people, at all times, and with the consent of all the faithful?

Ironic that the very “science” Dahl-Regis cites as justifying the vaccination program as
being fully protective is the same source she chooses to ignore. CDC say test!!! Why would they say that unless their science suggests it? But then, aren’t they the source that also update their opinions based on their changing science? Given that to be true can we expect them to change their opinion on the efficacy and safety of the vaccine too?
Doublethink!

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/is…

Israeli scientists develop two new drugs to combat COVID. Both drugs have high efficacy and one of them uses ingredients that have proven safe over decades. They keep people off ventilators and out of hospital.

Let’s talk science.
This is what science confirms...
COVID is a new disease caused by a novel virus, SarsCov2, and the vaccinations developed for this have NEVER, repeat, never, been comprehensively studied in humans. In 2004, 2008, and 2012 there were studies done on ferrets and cats; with fatal outcomes.
In short.... this is experimental and according to international agreement and ethical common sense participation should be by fully informed consent.
Why, when the data clearly shows that it is a small demographic of the population who are at risk of severe disease outcomes, is such a drive for vaccination being pushed on everyone?
Why, when the evidence shows that young people are not severely affected by the disease, are vaccines be pushed on them?
Why, when in our own experience the disease can be controlled to the point of being COVID-free (remember last May) did our authorities and not utilize that further with keeping a National COVID-free bubble which could join other National bubbles?
Why, when evidence based data shows certain medications and supplements work highly effectively at keeping people out of hospital, is one method the only one being promoted?
Why, when scientific studies on the vaccines are still in progress until at least 2023, are people not being told that this is experimental and warned that there could be long term side effects?
Why is an experimental medical intervention that has only been approved as such get this much support while medications with decades of safety data get sidelined?
Why have our authorities and medical experts forgotten that this is a NOVEL virus and everything associated with it is new?
Why would medical experts throw caution to the wind and put us all at risk of of a potential medical crisis which could overwhelm our health care system worse than any wave of COVID?
Following the science and evidenced-based data is not evidently the practice.
Why?

“if fully vaccinated people do transmit the virus, it does not produce significant illness”
“If fully vaccinated....” is speculative.
“ It does not...” is a definitive statement.
”The story is still being written. The research is ongoing”
Can you really speculate an “if” and then declare something that is still being researched and is ongoing?
The studies are far from being over. There is no clear statement to be made on whether there is any significant illness!
All I ask is honesty and this is what we get!
“we’re being guided” might read...we are being told things that don’t make sense.
No trust without honesty.

What science? The long term study results are years in the future. We are still waiting for the results of a study being done in a PA uni on the shedding of vaccine particles. The studies done so far on carcinogenesis don’t look good. And we barely understand SARS Cov 2 let alone its variants, the long term effects of the disease, and the completely new, never used before, mRNA vaccine technology. Science has shown us numerous diseases associated with monkey DNA virus vaccines, like Sim40. What science are we willing to put our trust in? Evidence based results conclusively showed that we became COVID free last year. There was a way. But it wasn’t “politically correct”.

Offering the vaccine to 18-65 yr olds is an evidenced-based decision.
For those younger than 18 there are insufficient peer-reviewed safety studies available, meanwhile they generally fair well if infected with sars-cov2.
Those over 65 do not have much in the way of peer-reviewed safety studies and the evidence is suggesting reason for caution. For example, in Norway 33 elderly died after receiving vaccination. One report argued that they had co-morbidities. My contention with that would be the idea they were going to die anyways. What competent authority puts such people at risk, unless it is for the good of the Big Experiment?
The vaccine is a big experiment to which we are invited to participate. Trust is vital.
The fact is....if it is a novel virus it is therefore a novel vaccine program, and until we are at least 10 years in we will not have the evidence, to begin to know with any certainty, the outcomes.
An important note of caution to those who think the vaccination puts an end to masks and protocols of caution....it is not known if, and/or when, the vaccine sheds and renders a recipient "infectious". If it does we might as well have done a proper lockdown at the beginning of this pandemic and created our coved free bubble to which we could have opened to other coved free bubbles until the whole planet had cooperated, and become covid free (?) !

Things were bad and now he lost he car! He has to walk home from da hospital 😢