Comment history

duppyVAT says...

sue ............ please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .................sue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

duppyVAT says...

Gowan Bowe ............ STFU. You went right along with the VAT plan with minimal resistance.... cuz the accountants gonna make shit loads of money from this VAT as well. Everyone exploiting the small man ... thats why the reasl cost of VAT is 15-20%....... not 7.5%.

duppyVAT says...

thats the best calculation for the day ......... . that would be the sentiments of 90% of bahamians

On VAT to make Bahamians $2,000 poorer annually

Posted 20 January 2015, 2:48 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

sue renew bahamas ............................ smdh

duppyVAT says...

how?????????????????? execute them chinese style??????????????

duppyVAT says...

Can the President and/or the Treasurer provide the members today with the monthy income and expenditure of the BUT??????????

They (Prez/Treas) create bogus/vague reports for the AGM (June) and then months later, the Executive has to suspend the substantive financial officers for alleged mis-spending of protected members assets. What is the role of the AGM delegates????? accountability!!!!

This is shameful and embarrassing for public school teachers who are bound to the BUT by law.

duppyVAT says...

Yeh man!!!!!!!!!!! Let them sling mud in the courts...... hope the case comes up before 2017!!!!!!!

duppyVAT says...

Politics makes strange bed fellows!!!! I will wait and see how the government will reclaim their $120,000 from a crooked contractor who doesn't pay his workers!!!!! This will leave a lot of egg on Perry, Brave, A Forbes and V Alfred faces!!! .............. and Bahamians getting screwed out of more Treasury money

On $120,000 to repair BAMSI

Posted 20 January 2015, 1:17 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

if anyone can beat the Chinese at their own game ......... it might be the Bahamian lawyers (pirates)

On Bahamas urged: Seize the moment on China

Posted 20 January 2015, 1:11 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

Cookie jar aside (and there is a good amount of cookies in the BUT jar) ....... but there is a disturbing side to this saga that members should be concerned with ........

(1) Who made up this ad hoc kangaroo appeals committee?

(2) Is the Executive/SG able to run the union without the President?

(3) Can the President hold the Union hostage based on the BUT Constitution?

(4) Will this end up in the Supreme Court if an impasse continues and who will pay the bill?

(5) Are there MOE or anti Belinda operatives at work in the BUT that are sabotaging the CBA negotiations?