It's not even about his arrogance, it's the fact that the statement is so blatantly hypocritical that gets me.
The only thing I am getting from the statement is a sense of urgency for a yes vote by the Government. What the hell did they agree to? Why all this pressure for a yes vote?
If Mitchell is rearing his head at this point just to throw more lies and accusations at the vote no campaign, it must mean the no vote is winning. Lol. Interesting development.
I watched her whole speech on Facebook and it gave me goose pimples. I am so glad she added her voice to this debate and with her understanding of the law and the ramifications, I can see why she drew this conclusion. I am even more persuaded to vote NO. Go Dame!
Not true. I understand he has had hand picked most of the persons who are now on the council. The old MP's (including Hubert Ingraham) were put out under the FNM constitution as it required that they only remain on it for 2 years after losing their seats. They were recently removed in favour of persons who actually could stomach him.
If voting No opens the door, I'm curious to know why gays haven't tried before this point to challenge the constitution and get married. I'm sure they have intellects among them. But I guess the light bulb just came on after the proposed referendum.
jackbnimble says...
We weren't being reckless for the past 40 years. Only a handful of people want this (citizenship for foreigners). Mercifully they are in the minority.
On EDITORIAL: Now is the time to do what is right - vote 'Yes'
Posted 6 June 2016, 2:26 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
Isn't Watson one of his best friends? Guess it's as close to grove as they will get for a statement.
On Ingraham return ‘not in the realm of possibility’
Posted 6 June 2016, 2:24 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
It's not even about his arrogance, it's the fact that the statement is so blatantly hypocritical that gets me.
The only thing I am getting from the statement is a sense of urgency for a yes vote by the Government. What the hell did they agree to? Why all this pressure for a yes vote?
If Mitchell is rearing his head at this point just to throw more lies and accusations at the vote no campaign, it must mean the no vote is winning. Lol. Interesting development.
On Mitchell: Deception by vote ‘no’ side is a sin
Posted 2 June 2016, 12:34 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
She admitted that in the beginning she did not read them but when she did she was more distressed and knew they were a waste of time.
On Dame Joan: Referendum a ruse for LGBT rights
Posted 2 June 2016, 9:29 a.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
"Despite the infighting, Mr Moore maintained that the public is supporting Dr Minnis as the opposition leader and believes he can lead the Bahamas".
Yeah. Sure. Call a rally and see who shows up. Most of your supporters have jumped ship cuz he's at the helm. PLEASE in Jesus' name replace him!
On FNM founding father hits out at MPs’ actions
Posted 1 June 2016, 3:56 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
I watched her whole speech on Facebook and it gave me goose pimples. I am so glad she added her voice to this debate and with her understanding of the law and the ramifications, I can see why she drew this conclusion. I am even more persuaded to vote NO. Go Dame!
On Dame Joan: Referendum a ruse for LGBT rights
Posted 1 June 2016, 3:50 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
To the contrary, there is a large contingent of us who know better! We know foolishness when we see it that's why we voting NO!
On Gray: Vote hijacked by religious community
Posted 1 June 2016, 3:45 p.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
Yeah call a spade a spade. They just want him gone. He's leading them into defeat.
On Butler-Turner: Party is not as strong as it should be
Posted 1 June 2016, 9:23 a.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
Not true. I understand he has had hand picked most of the persons who are now on the council. The old MP's (including Hubert Ingraham) were put out under the FNM constitution as it required that they only remain on it for 2 years after losing their seats. They were recently removed in favour of persons who actually could stomach him.
On Butler-Turner: Party is not as strong as it should be
Posted 1 June 2016, 9:22 a.m. Suggest removal
jackbnimble says...
If voting No opens the door, I'm curious to know why gays haven't tried before this point to challenge the constitution and get married. I'm sure they have intellects among them. But I guess the light bulb just came on after the proposed referendum.
On ‘Voting no could open door to same-sex marriage’
Posted 31 May 2016, 3:15 p.m. Suggest removal