"The communities most impacted must have the greatest say and ownership of the prescribed solutions to their problems". Lol. Good thing those are prescribed.
Aren't their MP's supposed to be the local gov't? I mean what else are they doing tif they're not cabinet members.
I understand bringing Rony back on the basis that immigration apparently didn't let him make calls and didn't have record of him being deported or being there, fishy breech in procedure, but being able to prove after fact is different from illegal deportation. This might be wrongful deportation but others would simply be an appeal, where they were deported accidentally because they couldn't prove even being given full opportunity to do so , accurate procedure. Can't blame immigration if you're caught up in the sweep for you not meeting the deadline in the constitution to submit and then also Mitchell's grace period without securing a lawyer previously for a qualifying excuse and additionally not having any of the documents.. Can only blame them for not giving all the allowances they're supposed.
The process isn't simply saying they were born here and then not having to show immigration anything, otherwise how will the green team approach obvious recent landers? If a boat lands in Inagua where everyone knows everyone, all they'll have to do is say they were born here to the officer and be awarded clogging up court after finding and showing solely a fake birth certificate (then suing). Everyone who lived here for 15 years from childhood should do court. If you were born here and don't want to do court, apply. With a pending article 7 submission you wouldn't even end up in Carmichael. So detention (although other methods could be used) is not illegal if you know you're supposed to have the proof. The only reason they wouldn't already have expulsion protection would be because they never submitted or got rejected.
Does this precedent mean the ones born here who went back as babies waiting until 18 to apply at their embassy or never thought of doing so can just return without being naturalized? There's also no deportation record on them. So now you're going to have to take scores of thousands of those in America too facing Trump deportation even though they left voluntarily if taking someone's word for it is all needed to avoid an immigration officer.
The time spent in the Bahamas has to be considered. Any article 7 young child that went back with the parent shouldn't be considered illegal deportation.
Immigration should have digital records. With this case, fake birth certificates and lost claims will go up if his time here isn't considered since applying is no longer needed. I think the application is $5?
killemwitdakno says...
As part of the transparency cabinet, how can he fix his mouth? Is that a threat?
On Minister 'detests' Contractor chief's talking through media
Posted 3 February 2018, 2:25 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
Sure Banniser sure.
See the "most important negotiating objectives" for "eliminating the following barriers".
- Discriminatory licensing or registration procedures
- Restrictions on the types of projects that can be undertaken by foreign service suppliers
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/se…
Maybe this is why they're dragging their feet on licensing.
On Minister 'detests' Contractor chief's talking through media
Posted 3 February 2018, 2:22 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
"The communities most impacted must have the greatest say and ownership of the prescribed solutions to their problems". Lol. Good thing those are prescribed.
Aren't their MP's supposed to be the local gov't? I mean what else are they doing tif they're not cabinet members.
On Sustainable Nassau targets $450m spend
Posted 3 February 2018, 2:13 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
wtf
On DPM: Blockchain could have halted Jean-Rony's exile
Posted 3 February 2018, 2:11 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
I thought they already had this before Christmas. Those kids need to learn schoolwork.
On Date for GB Junior Junkanoo Parade
Posted 3 February 2018, 1:23 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
I hope Turnquest has a qualifying enough degree to comment.
On ‘Grads only’, RBC boss ‘uninformed’
Posted 3 February 2018, 1:19 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
I understand bringing Rony back on the basis that immigration apparently didn't let him make calls and didn't have record of him being deported or being there, fishy breech in procedure, but being able to prove after fact is different from illegal deportation. This might be wrongful deportation but others would simply be an appeal, where they were deported accidentally because they couldn't prove even being given full opportunity to do so , accurate procedure. Can't blame immigration if you're caught up in the sweep for you not meeting the deadline in the constitution to submit and then also Mitchell's grace period without securing a lawyer previously for a qualifying excuse and additionally not having any of the documents..
Can only blame them for not giving all the allowances they're supposed.
The process isn't simply saying they were born here and then not having to show immigration anything, otherwise how will the green team approach obvious recent landers? If a boat lands in Inagua where everyone knows everyone, all they'll have to do is say they were born here to the officer and be awarded clogging up court after finding and showing solely a fake birth certificate (then suing). Everyone who lived here for 15 years from childhood should do court. If you were born here and don't want to do court, apply. With a pending article 7 submission you wouldn't even end up in Carmichael. So detention (although other methods could be used) is not illegal if you know you're supposed to have the proof. The only reason they wouldn't already have expulsion protection would be because they never submitted or got rejected.
Does this precedent mean the ones born here who went back as babies waiting until 18 to apply at their embassy or never thought of doing so can just return without being naturalized? There's also no deportation record on them. So now you're going to have to take scores of thousands of those in America too facing Trump deportation even though they left voluntarily if taking someone's word for it is all needed to avoid an immigration officer.
The time spent in the Bahamas has to be considered. Any article 7 young child that went back with the parent shouldn't be considered illegal deportation.
Immigration should have digital records. With this case, fake birth certificates and lost claims will go up if his time here isn't considered since applying is no longer needed. I think the application is $5?
On Jean Rony’s ruling impacts thousands
Posted 1 February 2018, 4:02 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
That's why they should have done the 1% corporate tax knowing they would lose the companies.
On What Donald Trump’s Tax Reform means for the Bahamas
Posted 1 February 2018, 2:44 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
Have a workshop teaching the parental control features.
On POLICE ADVICE: Surfing safely with your child online
Posted 31 January 2018, 8:39 a.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
Mean parents
On Intervention needed in lives of at-risk youth
Posted 31 January 2018, 8:13 a.m. Suggest removal