I understand bringing Rony back on the basis that immigration apparently didn't let him make calls and didn't have record of him being deported or being there, fishy breech in procedure, but being able to prove after fact is different from illegal deportation. This might be wrongful deportation but others would simply be an appeal, where they were deported accidentally because they couldn't prove even being given full opportunity to do so , accurate procedure. Can't blame immigration if you're caught up in the sweep for you not meeting the deadline in the constitution to submit and then also Mitchell's grace period without securing a lawyer previously for a qualifying excuse and additionally not having any of the documents..
Can only blame them for not giving all the allowances they're supposed.

The process isn't simply saying they were born here and then not having to show immigration anything, otherwise how will the green team approach obvious recent landers? If a boat lands in Inagua where everyone knows everyone, all they'll have to do is say they were born here to the officer and be awarded clogging up court after finding and showing solely a fake birth certificate (then suing). Everyone who lived here for 15 years from childhood should do court. If you were born here and don't want to do court, apply. With a pending article 7 submission you wouldn't even end up in Carmichael. So detention (although other methods could be used) is not illegal if you know you're supposed to have the proof. The only reason they wouldn't already have expulsion protection would be because they never submitted or got rejected.

Does this precedent mean the ones born here who went back as babies waiting until 18 to apply at their embassy or never thought of doing so can just return without being naturalized? There's also no deportation record on them. So now you're going to have to take scores of thousands of those in America too facing Trump deportation even though they left voluntarily if taking someone's word for it is all needed to avoid an immigration officer.

The time spent in the Bahamas has to be considered. Any article 7 young child that went back with the parent shouldn't be considered illegal deportation.

Immigration should have digital records. With this case, fake birth certificates and lost claims will go up if his time here isn't considered since applying is no longer needed. I think the application is $5?

That's why they should have done the 1% corporate tax knowing they would lose the companies.

Have a workshop teaching the parental control features.

Mean parents

Can't look up a company called Grand Palm Beach Aquisitions LTD but ok.

Report milestones on this.

Yes, warn em.

Which is who?

Just use SeeClickFix.com

Shut up