Comment history

licks2 says...

Mr. Smith sees that Haitian nationality "kills" his case. . .Mr. Charles will be sent back later. . .that document puts them in a no-win situation. . .hard-up against the constitution!! Them legal "eggheads" are playing "gatcha" legal poker. . .

On Jean Rony come home

Posted 2 February 2018, 12:09 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

Hahahahahahahahahaha. . .Mr. Smith ya "jookin-up" begins. . .they permitted travel documents to a Haitian. . .not a Bahamian! Mr. Smith knows the national repercussion of that recorded nationality. . .the government is telling THEM where this pyrric victory for them is going. . .he can come and state his case. . .as a Haitian. . .constitutionally he is "swing". . .thanks to his activist judge and Mr. Smith. Now he has to fight our constitution on the matter of nationality. . .which go straight to article 7 of the constitution. . .which is entrenched and cannot be change by no court or parliament. . .bringing this fight between the Haitian community and the Bahamian people. . .no matter which decent. Mr. Smith sees his problem" by them giving and will try to block it by going to court . . .but with an empty hand. . .he cannot get the constitution set aside for his client. . .

On Jean Rony come home

Posted 2 February 2018, 12:05 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

Now you know that I don't follow you many places. . .but I must say that I too am wondering "what Symonette is dealing with". . .the activist judge in this ruling, the illegal Hatitian community, Fred Smith et al all have denied the Bahamian constitution its ''right to rule our nation without interference from outsiders" . . .and BS seem "geeing them the kitchen sink and een listen ta da peoples dem"! Make no mistake, I don't believe that the people are fighting Mr. Charles as much as they are pissed with Mr. Smith. . .who is so spoiled and biased that now he brought down the whole house on his people's heads. . .that ruling has long and detrimental effects for the illegal immigrant community. . .and for those who were born here to illegal parents and missed their constitutional application dates. Don't forget that IRC requested that all children of illegal parents be deported with their parents. . .

On Fraudulent papers now central issue

Posted 1 February 2018, 4:21 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

This is done from dog years (not finger prints).. . .each hospital birth is. . .I mean with a big IS. . .recorded before that child leaves the hospital! I was in the RG's office getting a birth record for my last daughter when a Haitian woman brought a yellow legal pad sheet saying that the individual was born in a house in cowpen road. . .all signed by a midwife. . .not even notarized by a notary public. . .she was furious at the clerk because she stated that she could not accept that document as proof of birth in the Bahamas. I could remember thinking: "what do some of these people dealing with"!

On Fraudulent papers now central issue

Posted 1 February 2018, 4:09 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

mr. charles' case if far different than the famous "red party" case. . .the reds case was not trying to prove who was born where. . .but status at birth. . .the "'afterdavids" (lol!) . . .said that Mr. Charles was born here to two illegal parents of Haitian decent. . .Mr. Red was born here to one illegal woman of Haitian decent and one Bahamian citizen as father! Mr. Red was smack-dab Bahamian at birth (because who was parents at birth, not where was birth). . .Mr. Charles had to wait until 18-19 (some disagree) and apply for citizenship status! Mr. Monroe point was used by Mr. Smith on behalf of Mr. Charles. . .Munroe's point is already a point in law in this country. . .he was playing politics at that time!

On Fraudulent papers now central issue

Posted 1 February 2018, 3:59 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

That's where the government is going with their "review" of Mr. Charles' case. . .they have no record of him in our records. . .he says he was born one day with a different name and his family says he is another name. . .and another birthdate. . .messy situation at most!!

On Fraudulent papers now central issue

Posted 1 February 2018, 12:43 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

If that was the case Mr. Smith would have done so. . .or why would the supreme court rule on a ha-bus corpus petition in favor of the complainant "from an illegal holding facility" . . . is the court condoning the illegal holding facility operation. . .knowing they are existing? Use ya head and leave the dumb nonsense to the politicians. . .

On Fraudulent papers now central issue

Posted 1 February 2018, 12:40 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

True my fellow. . .its all "cash on the barrel head" from here on in. . .Mr. Smith's "antics" has finally done him in. . .illegals paying fines, going to jail before deported, getting a criminal record, enforcement of article 7 of the constitution. . .this case is a pyrric victory for Mr. Smith. . .he shot the whole haitian community in the foot. . .this mess has just begun for the migrants. . .

On Jean Rony’s ruling impacts thousands

Posted 1 February 2018, 12:33 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

TRUE. . .especially if that case was overturned in appeal or by the PC. . .but it can be used to establish a 'line of reasoning and logical outcome" used and handed down by a previous case decision. Also, I can be tried for murder of joe bain. . .previously killed 4 persons before joe bain. . .that damning information can't be used against me in the current trial. . .I am before the court for killing joe bain. . .not the 7 others. . .only information for the joe bain case is allowed. . .if any persons inadvertently introduce that information it can result in a mistrial, dismissal or ground for dismissal on appeal because of information that prejudiced my right to fair trail fro killing joe bain!

On Jean Rony’s ruling impacts thousands

Posted 1 February 2018, 12:26 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

I agree with you on all points except. . ."the court will not deport". . .it has no choice. . .the law dictates that they do. . .they have been and are now doing so. . .the problem with this case is that the ID were not taking those of Haitian decent to court. . .they are just too many. . .this case only serves to force them to now go to court!

On Jean Rony’s ruling impacts thousands

Posted 1 February 2018, 12:09 p.m. Suggest removal