You are not being too smart in this case. . .that article is "entrenched" in our constitution. . meaning "only" the people can change it by referendum. . .fee simple. if the people want retroactive enforcement. . .they will get it. . .or nobody. . .i mean nobody. . .including mr. smith will get that article amended! this case is truly the people's time. what do you think the bahamian people will do if this goes to referendum. . .the way they fell about mr. charles, his lawyer, the judge and a few others? a big fat no!! remember the gender equality referendum? The government had a "true loop hole" to scoot around that gender question. . .it already had an out existing within the constitution itself. . .this case has none. . .period! mr. smith created a them and us situation. . .with the people having the greatest power to change or grant his desires. . .the bahamian people "eat" in an elective kind of decision making any person of group that make them mad. . .the last may election, the gender referendum. . .mr charles will get nothing from these people! thanks to his combative lawyer!

Why? If this present law is so "gray area". . .then tell me why "hyped up" lawyer like smith file a write in the supreme court for a judicial ruling on that fact? The stated time frame "KILLS" any argument any lawyer can bring to our courts, the appeal court Amnesty International, World Court, UNHRC or any court on this planet! un charter 1954 in Geneva guarantees all member states that absolute right as members! All 25 UN accords allowed member states "RIGHT" to reservations, derogation or abstentions based on their national constitutions. . .which are absolutely off limit to other member countries interference! That's why this judge is in hot water now. . .he breached that international protocol. This membership right is most powerful in the UN. For example, the USA declined to become signatory to the Child protection accord. . .a security council member constitution did not allowed it to sign that most binding accord for children around the world. . but the USA leads all other nations in implementing the accords intents. . .they just can't constitutionally sign ti!

Out birth right is protected by our constitution. . .the world court. . .all 25 UN accords the Bahamas is signatory to. . .and international law. . .iron clad! Mr. Smith is a poor lawyer. . .he got his client trow in the pen again and a judge had to asked the government to compromise and allow him to stay out until his case is heard. . .there was no court order. . .the government allowed a compromise. . .Mr Smith raised hell when they were going to "slap" reporting requirements on him. . .the judge said that "the circumstances" did not necessarily required a reporting regiment. . .the government conceded. . .they were not received a court order! The delima 'created" by Mr Smith was jumping the gun a bringing the man here before the court got done. . .that where the government had its power of arrest from as well as the judge granted the stay of execution. Therefore, Mr. Charles "HAD TO" go to court to be released. Mr. Smith is making one big mess of this case. . .he is now in contempt of court. . .he knows that and they know that. . .the government and the court are "treading carefully" around this "wild and woolly" lose cannon lawyer. . .

There is no gray area in the time frame given by the constitution. . .why do you think that mr. smith "jumped the gun" and brought in Mr. Charles before the government had its chance before the court. . .or why do you think that the same judge who ruled in the case granted a stay. . .allowed the Immigration to detain Mr. Charles without demanding a release from the DC as Smith demanded and had to be brought to court? I and everybody who have a "open view" or some reading skill knew that Mr. Charles release would happened while his case goes to court for review of stay! Mr. Smith knows that his case is dead in the water constitutionally and if he "push" through the courts Mr. Charles will be deported on constitutional ground. . .and the PC will uphold that deportation! Mr. Smith is "trying his case in public" because he knows in law he has no case!!

so please tell why "ya people" keep coming here. . .to a land of disgrace? if you have problems with the rule of law just say so!

dig into canada's immigration cases with haitians. . .all are sent back post hast. . .let them mps talk. . .canada does the very same thing. . .they will not even allow immigrants children attend school if their parents are illegal or in the process of getting straight!

There is really no loop hole. . .and a referendum is what Mr. Smith is trying his hardest to avoid. . .he will never allow that question to go before the court. . .he will get a ruling that even the pc will not change! he has no case. . .his big mouth and a poor ruling by an activist judge has gotten all other persons in mr rony's case to get flushed down the toilet!!

just step back from the emotional tirade. . .its call rule of law. you row about one judge"ruling" being ignored as an injustice. . .while asking us to disregard the emergency stay "ruling" of another judge? that's how them cookie crumble dude. yinna were asking for a court appearance before deportation. . .now that's what ya getting and ya mad!

i won't even try to reason with you. . .

His lawyer is acting the fool and playing "not by the rules". . .he will only make it worse for the man. . .yall ask that this case is played by the rule of law. . .here it is. . .rule of law!!