Comment history

marrcus says...

In 2012, DNA managed to siphon off enough votes to give the PLP a 29/9 victory. IF you take all the DNA votes and put them in the FNM column (lets be honest, ain't no PLP voting for DNA) IF all those votes went to FNM, the result would have been fnm 24 - plp 14. If Bran runs a full slate in the next election (38 candidates) then PGC gets an easy win. plp forever....get used to it!

marrcus says...

In 2012, DNA managed to siphon off enough votes to give the PLP a 29/9 victory. IF you take all the DNA votes and put them in the FNM column (lets be honest, ain't no PLP voting for DNA) IF all those votes went to FNM, the result would have been fnm 24 - plp 14. If Bran runs a full slate in the next election (38 candidates) then PGC gets an easy win. plp forever....get used to it!

marrcus says...

In 2012, DNA managed to siphon off enough votes to give the PLP a 29/9 victory. IF you take all the DNA votes and put them in the FNM column (lets be honest, ain't no PLP voting for DNA) IF all those votes went to FNM, the result would have been fnm 24 - plp 14. If Bran runs a full slate in the next election (38 candidates) then PGC gets an easy win. plp forever....get used to it!

marrcus says...

In 2012, DNA managed to siphon off enough votes to give the PLP a 29/9 victory. IF you take all the DNA votes and put them in the FNM column (lets be honest, ain't no PLP voting for DNA) IF all those votes went to FNM, the result would have been fnm 24 - plp 14. If Bran runs a full slate in the next election (38 candidates) then PGC gets an easy win. plp forever....get used to it!

On Minnis 'planning council shake-up'

Posted 7 January 2016, 4:59 p.m. Suggest removal

marrcus says...

was never about sovereignty...........chapter 11 hearings would have exposed all of the shenanigans that went on (are going on) in this mess. Lawyers would be all up in Perrys junk. Perry don't play dat. PLP forever.