Talk cheap Mr. Prime Minister...but like my ma teach me "money buy land"!! Where you gettin' the money from to build and staff this new hospital? Let me guess! You guh borry it and add more debt fuh my grandchirren dem to pay!
I hope the money they got from reselling the gasoline is enough to keep their families going while they're locked up in prison...SMT! Not even worth it, but a thief always believes he has profited from his sticky fingers.
One would think that URCA with "all of the bright minds" employed there would recognize the impact of perception on that organization's image. It's about perception, URCA...don't you get it? p-e-r-c-e-p-t-i-o-n!!!!
Sadly, Rev'd Hall, you are speaking too much truth. The Christian Council is not interested in removing the beam 'cause it's way easier to remove the mote.
More importantly, was this person vetted at all? The reason that the vetting process is there is to prevent the very appearance of a scandal which could potentially taint a Minister of Government and even the Government. When it comes to the public perception of Government Ministers, discretion is always better than valour if to exercise discretion avoids the perception that a Minister has been compromised. The Minister of Education is politically naive if he doesn't recognize the potential for a public image/relations disaster in this matter. Mr. Lamm complains that he wasn't given any government contracts in the last four years. Could the reason be because in the last four years he has been accused before the Court and the former Administration was prudent enough to avoid the pitfalls of potential scandal? Something to think about.
mynameis says...
Talk cheap Mr. Prime Minister...but like my ma teach me "money buy land"!! Where you gettin' the money from to build and staff this new hospital? Let me guess! You guh borry it and add more debt fuh my grandchirren dem to pay!
On PM promises new hospital for Eleuthera
Posted 31 October 2012, 10:31 a.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
Nationbuilder you took the words right out of my head!! Deja vu!
On Storm floods 'frightening'
Posted 29 October 2012, 7:15 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
It's "Audley" not Odley!
On Cop killer jailed for life
Posted 20 October 2012, 6:16 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
I hope the money they got from reselling the gasoline is enough to keep their families going while they're locked up in prison...SMT! Not even worth it, but a thief always believes he has profited from his sticky fingers.
On Former officers guilty of stealing gasoline
Posted 15 September 2012, 4:06 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
One would think that URCA with "all of the bright minds" employed there would recognize the impact of perception on that organization's image. It's about perception, URCA...don't you get it? p-e-r-c-e-p-t-i-o-n!!!!
On URCA denies conflict
Posted 14 September 2012, 2:52 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
Sadly, Rev'd Hall, you are speaking too much truth. The Christian Council is not interested in removing the beam 'cause it's way easier to remove the mote.
On Followers must stop gambling
Posted 11 September 2012, 2:47 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
I'm not the editor of the Tribune...but the answe is yes.
On Police raid 'strip club'
Posted 11 September 2012, 10:52 a.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
I would hope not...and if any sale is going to happen, Ruffin is the last person to sell to...
On Brookfield 'not interested' in selling Atlantis
Posted 6 September 2012, 12:38 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
More importantly, was this person vetted at all? The reason that the vetting process is there is to prevent the very appearance of a scandal which could potentially taint a Minister of Government and even the Government. When it comes to the public perception of Government Ministers, discretion is always better than valour if to exercise discretion avoids the perception that a Minister has been compromised. The Minister of Education is politically naive if he doesn't recognize the potential for a public image/relations disaster in this matter.
Mr. Lamm complains that he wasn't given any government contracts in the last four years. Could the reason be because in the last four years he has been accused before the Court and the former Administration was prudent enough to avoid the pitfalls of potential scandal? Something to think about.
On Questions on drugs 'link' to contracts
Posted 10 August 2012, 2:53 p.m. Suggest removal
mynameis says...
National security and an intelligence agency...Who's watching you now?
On Government presses ahead with creation of National Intelligence Agency
Posted 10 August 2012, 10:26 a.m. Suggest removal