the last you want is a privately funded inquiry. If it ever turns out to be favourable for anyone, people will say, x or y funded it blah blah. If there is an inquiry it should be publicly funded. it is what it is.

we voted the FNM out of office. What did the new guys do to fix the problem since 2021. Both of these parties are to blame.

this is a new article. The first one was his statement.

https://www.tribune242.com/news/2024/de…

I'll put what he said.

> "These discussions aim to determine
> whether any concerns or intelligence
> about these activities were raised
> during their tenures and, if so, how
> they were addressed."

So simply put, he is going to find out if the former Prime Minister, Minister or former Commissioners have information on this that he cant find otherwise.

If this is the case and perhaps they have some info, then thats a another indictment that perhaps this was known in some part that only the former chiefs would have and no one in the beauracracy can provide.

If the current COP was blindsided and they have this information and he doesnt then that would imply that he has no idea whats going on and we have an even bigger problem on information sharing.

He is the head of the organization, he should make it his business to know if an organization you are taking over has knowledge of any major investigation that may affect your organization.

If they do have information that no one else who is currently there can or could have provide him there is a bigger indictment on whatever thing we are passing on as a national security/intelligence apparatus.

If all of this is the case and he has to go to them, then I didn't read what is he going to implement to ensure that information that he or the current Minister has is passed on to the next set to prevent them having to call him if something pops off. None of this is encouraging.

Fernander also wants us to believe that somehow the former Commisoners and PM and Minister will have some magic information that no one in the entire RBPF doesn't have?

If they have any info someone else in the force does.
Does he want us to think that either the US or his own force would have known of this prior to him joining and the kept it secret from him for the past 2.5 years?
.

> The introduction of body cameras has
> helped ensure that every police
> interaction is recorded and
> accountable.

If Body cams are a success every officer should wear one, every police car should have dash recordings and every interrogations should be taped. Then every interaction should be requestable via a FOIA request. If the govt is too lazy to implement one then create your own request system outside of of FOIA. Police reports should be requestable via FOIAs or whatever reporting system you implement.

Show us you are truly committed to transparency.

> "At no time during my tenure did any
> of our international partners raise
> concerns about the activities outlined
> in the US indictment."

Obviously not. This alone tells you how much they dont trust the leadership to leak thier investigation. They know whats going on with the CDU guy, the head of your airwing is under investigation, they know that OBPAT was compromised, who would they trust?

How is this in the remit of the consumer protection commission. Sounds like they have nothing better to do

Does anyone have any more "I'm a fool" stickers lying around. I left mines home. I need to put it on my forehead before anyone sees me without it.

he should seek financial advice based on his personal situation: debts, assets, risk appetite, immediate obligations, future plans and go from there. suppose he is not an entrepreneur?

Having used dhl to ship directly here before it's on the invoice value