and very much this!!! Ingraham was naive, out of his depth and very much ill advised by Bumbling Bill Allen and the greedy Higgs and Johnson law firm.

THIS!!!

Mudda, some of what you say is true, some is inaccurate., sone is misdirection. Quickly, Sears has always supported an anti 'alphabet soup' stance. Si your assertion here us simply not true. Go back to when the terribly ill informed Hubert Ingraham changed most of our financial services laws. John Delaney was the 'Squealer' to Ingraham's 'Napolean'. Sears opposed all of this from then, and, if you may recall, was one of Sesrs campaign promises in 2002 election. So your assertion is not true. Sears had been consistent.
Which leads me to the alphabet soup agencies have been beating us up from before Sebas was a two- bit hustler and while Flowers was still a pilot. The numbers boys are just an excuse by international agencies to come after us. Incidentally, look up how many numbers houses are in Mauritius- another blacklisted country. So dont overexaggerste the numbers boys effect. The money they bring in is negligible in international circles. Doesnt even register on the global radar. Read the corresponding banking report produced by the IMF, circa 2018, to see just hiw negligible numbers houses are.
Finalky, yes, there are former regulators on Sebas' Board, but existing regularors have not been compromised. If tou have evidence of the same, then produce it. Btw, those old pasture former regulators were so incompetent that the only jobs most could get was to sit on Sebas' board, so that should tell you something about how serious to take them.
This issue is simply white countries trying to eliminate black and brown countries, whom they (white) feel that they are superior too. Modern day colonization, if you will. Dont fall for the silly numbers boys rhetoric.

I think that is a pejorative indictment on us as a people. We want the truth as long as it comes from someone we "like". Part of the reason why we are in the state that we are in now.

I think I am with Shane on this one. The young lady has no justification for a promotion, having regard to her behaviour and unprofessionalism during the Gibson case. In any real country she would be fired, not promoted.
The Shane Gibson trolling about his past behaviour has nothing to do with the promotion, which again, she should not have received.

I quoted you accurately.

I came just to read mudda rage on James Smith. Somewhat disappointed, mudda!

Yes, but Senate positions are not perpetual. One can be removed as a senator and subsequently replaced, depending on the exigencies of the Government. Which, you would agree, today's circumstances would make the removal of a senator quite appropriate, no - particularly if you are replacing with one of the names I proffered earlier?

Real talk, don't be so defensive. Just because he is not a minister does not mean that his ideas are gone. I don't think this is very difficult to comprehend at all. And, by they way, can the PM - an MD, without a portfolio, btw - replace him? That's one. Conville Brown (MD), Carlos Thomas (MD) that's two, Charles Diggis (MD), that's four. That's four qualified, FNM-leaning doctors, btw. Still waiting?

Agreed...Gracious, I am agreeing with mudda. :-)