No it is not. It was the right, decent and honourable action to take. There really should not be much debate about this to be honest.

Sigh. He did not say that. He said that he would contact his members to come to a final position. His predecessor also said that opening now would be "a risk". Would you care to share the link where Pratt said that we should open now?

What does Tanya McCartney have to do with this. That is, why single her out, compared with all the other geezers on the committee.

Its funny that you petulantly attack Birdie, yet you dont criticize the veracity of her/his comments. It appears, based on all the information that has been put in the public domain (PM/Sands/Wilchcombe) that Birdie is correct and, all along the plan was for the residents to return. But, keep your slanted glasses on, if you must.

I see what you did there, sickened. Touche.

The point of curfew is not to get rid of Covid, but rather to slow the pace so the health system is not overburdened. We still need to do this because our banana republic country will not be able to cope with concurrent wides scale cases. You have to continue with the shutdown.

So, in your petulant thinking, what you are really saying is "what is good for the goose is good for the gander"? Or, even more 5-year oldish, "but he did it".

Wholeheartedly agree. Anyone who has an issue with this particular matter that Brave is speaking about either lacks objectivity or is hopelessly obtuse. Moncour, we are suppose to be freethinkers and critical thinkers, we need to put our big boy pants on and learn to sift through the 80% vs the 20%, if we think we are as intelligent as we try to claim we are, that is.

Care to deal with the substantive issues he is making? Or is your free thinking only bent with an FNM slant?

Who cares about that. Brave is right and - in this instance, at least - is trying to defend Bahamians. Take your blinders off, get your head out of your butt, or continue on your little non-objective tangent, I suppose.