So you get rid of the emergency orders and replace them with in effect emergency orders. This is like the VAT to 10%, but we are increasing plenty of other items so you lose out situation. Apart from what looks like no curfew the rest are the same or worse (now if vaccinated you need to show a test to go indoor dining).
So if i have a company that operates inside and outside the bubble i will be able to mandate that all employees must be vaccinated? I assume that means the big hotels can do this and then the need for staff to pay for their own Covid tests is gone.
How can he keep a straight face and say that the lowest income people will spend 75% of their income on items that will now be 10% when he knows that the largest item in that is rent and that is not Vatable. then there is BPL which under $200 is not Vatable. He knows it will increase the expenses. I do agree the new regime is easier to process and will lead to more revenue, but stop lying about the effect on the lowest earners. Also if one of the reasons for the increase to 12% was for the exemptions, then bring it back to 7.5% without the exemptions.
You are not taking into account the VAT on the initial price so the VAT on the $4 milk will be $0.40. Over the year in your example that will be $14.5 million (if my math's are right). Though i highly doubt nearly all Bahamians go through 2 liters a week. In order to pay for it they feel the compliance will go to over 90% again which will lead to the extra revenue.
Nothing will come of this. These politicians always say stuff in the house of assembly and then don't produce any evidence to back them up. As long as people talk about it, they are happy.
Thats $550 million if there is no growth in the economy. Assuming they expect the economy to grow it will be a lot more then that. Only a couple of ways that can be done, and i assume one of them is income tax. Not sure they will be able to raise the amount needed with income tax unless they start at a very low rate of income, even then this would be hard due to the population size.
They aren't plugging the hole though. They admit the hole will get bigger, but this will be covered by increased spending and those 0% items being 10% now. But there is nothing in it about plugging the hole.
Of course its reckless as they have just told the credit ratings agents we are in an even worse shape then we said before. But it was politics. FNM did the same to PLP last time with their $700 million unknown liabilities. SO i guess if PLP lose the next election we will hear $1.3 billion unknown next time.
Dawes says...
So you get rid of the emergency orders and replace them with in effect emergency orders. This is like the VAT to 10%, but we are increasing plenty of other items so you lose out situation. Apart from what looks like no curfew the rest are the same or worse (now if vaccinated you need to show a test to go indoor dining).
On New rules for a ‘new reality’
Posted 2 November 2021, 9:08 a.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
If they put VAT back on Homeowners insurance there will be no increased spending by homeowners. That 10% would wipe out any 2% savings on other items.
On Insurers warn that VAT reversal ‘totally asinine’
Posted 2 November 2021, 9:02 a.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
So if i have a company that operates inside and outside the bubble i will be able to mandate that all employees must be vaccinated? I assume that means the big hotels can do this and then the need for staff to pay for their own Covid tests is gone.
On ‘COVID bubble’ plan suggested for events
Posted 29 October 2021, 3:12 p.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
If you have the report then produce it. Otherwise stop saying its $1 billion when the report has not been finalized.
On $1bn difference in fiscal state? It is what it is
Posted 29 October 2021, 11:30 a.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
How can he keep a straight face and say that the lowest income people will spend 75% of their income on items that will now be 10% when he knows that the largest item in that is rent and that is not Vatable. then there is BPL which under $200 is not Vatable. He knows it will increase the expenses. I do agree the new regime is easier to process and will lead to more revenue, but stop lying about the effect on the lowest earners. Also if one of the reasons for the increase to 12% was for the exemptions, then bring it back to 7.5% without the exemptions.
On VAT increase on breadbasket items ‘best practice’
Posted 29 October 2021, 11:29 a.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
You are not taking into account the VAT on the initial price so the VAT on the $4 milk will be $0.40. Over the year in your example that will be $14.5 million (if my math's are right). Though i highly doubt nearly all Bahamians go through 2 liters a week. In order to pay for it they feel the compliance will go to over 90% again which will lead to the extra revenue.
On VAT CUT BY JAN 1: PM Davis in pledge over 10% tax rate
Posted 29 October 2021, 8:57 a.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
Nothing will come of this. These politicians always say stuff in the house of assembly and then don't produce any evidence to back them up. As long as people talk about it, they are happy.
On ‘The truth and the dangerous’
Posted 28 October 2021, 4:22 p.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
Thats $550 million if there is no growth in the economy. Assuming they expect the economy to grow it will be a lot more then that. Only a couple of ways that can be done, and i assume one of them is income tax. Not sure they will be able to raise the amount needed with income tax unless they start at a very low rate of income, even then this would be hard due to the population size.
On PM targeting $550m annual revenue rise
Posted 28 October 2021, 3:31 p.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
They aren't plugging the hole though. They admit the hole will get bigger, but this will be covered by increased spending and those 0% items being 10% now. But there is nothing in it about plugging the hole.
On VAT CUT BY JAN 1: PM Davis in pledge over 10% tax rate
Posted 28 October 2021, 1:38 p.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
Of course its reckless as they have just told the credit ratings agents we are in an even worse shape then we said before. But it was politics. FNM did the same to PLP last time with their $700 million unknown liabilities. SO i guess if PLP lose the next election we will hear $1.3 billion unknown next time.
On Minnis: $1bn allegation is reckless and dangerous
Posted 28 October 2021, 9:50 a.m. Suggest removal