Again, perhaps I am beating a dead horse. No one spoke on what is owed, legally or otherwise. Anyone can act in response to something, doesn't matter if they have a legal basis or not. But regardless, I never spoke on whether they are entitled to any recovery in this case.

However, you keep parroting that investors are not entitled to funds, they can lose all money. I assume you have read the term sheet on the investment? This isn't even true for most investments so it's really weird you keep parroting this unsecured investment paradigm as if you must be running some shady investment house....

I do believe you've created an argument that I have not made at all.

I did not mention any entitlements of the investor.

But I guess you just had a point to make regardless?

Rumors about financial woes were building for over 1.5 years now. It seems the defense is disingenuous to the truth about ArawakX's issues. Insolvency is fair if not pleasant path to having a license cancelled or suspended. The Commission has failed significantly with FTX and other crypto ventures in providing any valuable oversight, but I don't believe it's equally failed in this regard.

Crowdsourcing has become a haven for ill advised ventures, in which the Bahamian public has seen no real successful entities to date in this financial sub-sector. ArawakX moved to capitalize on this empty field and reportedly was not completely incompetent but was a loss making venture, which seemed to stir the "Angel Investor" into action. Whether this action was malicious or not may be irrelevant. Without hard financial disclosures over the inception to date for ArawakX, all claims against or in support are wind outside of the courts.

He was removed from Parliament square at least once so that's 2 out of 3 so far. He hasn't however convinced any constituency to elect him or his flock. When he or if does it at Atlantis we can revisit.

Why is it always the folks who claim protest is good also want to make dissent of their ideological pits to be called a betrayal of The Bahamas. It's easy to then jump up and now claim I'm not (truly) Bahamian or some (uncle tom). Everyone that disagrees or believes otherwise than you has to be demonized and named the enemy. My generational 'belonging' is deeply rooted and my familial class was never upper echelons, but even explaining that is beneath the discussion as this does not inform a persons beliefs....

You still failed to show what informed you that "most Bahamians" are of this viewpoint that it's a crisis. But that can't be shown because you made it up right? Never asked or disagreed with approximate Hattian ethnic stats, which are being misused.

You also conveniently dropped this "February 2012, the daily newspaper The Nassau Guardian reported that the tens of thousands of Haitians living in the Bahamas are made up of illegal residents, persons with legal status, and those who have obtained Bahamian citizenship (13 Feb. 2012)"

The legal and long generational persons are part of your xenophobic and borderline prejudice "crisis"?

Saying most Bahamians is funny and probably just a lie. What even most basic UB survey or other survey conveyed this to you? Or is it, you have asked the persons in your own circles and believe this to be the nation?

Citing the UN for peaceful protests but for Lincoln Bain who scoffs and rages at all other UN guidelines on immigration and human rights is wanted two sets of standards.

Lincoln Bain is consistently a clown and saying he is a "paying guest' when he is forming a protest is even more clownish. Gun toting xenophobic actions that resort to lies and slander pose no respectable service to the country. Made the law abiding gun owners look like reckless fools. Anyone forming a 'protest' in form or function at Atlantis would be escorted away the same. The beach access protest of the past didn't as far as I can recall trespass on private property. I would have thought a failed political campaign would produce a better version of Lincoln Bain, but after the public rejection it seems to have only hardened his nationalistic small minded mission. Maybe he and his zealots can one day refine their dogmatic beliefs in fantasy and imagined plots into real productive aspects of Bahamian politics and social welfare. Until then, I wish nothing but misadventure to those that seek to spark hate and violence with the non-discerning flame of nationalistic rhetoric.

It's really funny now though, as I've tried to park there to grab something from Starbucks a few years back when it was empty and I was accosted and told I'll be towed away but many years before, I went to the restaurant and was told this was public parking and not SH's own. I guess they slowly decided it was theirs and intentionally didn't resolve the property tax assessment to give the basis for the argument. Lol

So as a response to Minnis' rebuttal that clears the clear political slander by PM Davis, you allude that there is issues there. Okay, but do you acknowledge the first matter being clearly resolved with purportedly all the correct steps taken? Davis made vague claims and Minnis provided references to controls and documentation.

I don't see how it's megalomania to be outraged especially when you have and they have the hard flipping evidence. In fact, it's a norm for people to be outraged when they know and can disprove a dangerous claim about their actions.

Minnis erred in several ways, but to include this as one of them is a big disingenuous and will cloud any future claims as being similarly lacking in substance.